Page 66 - The European Business Review
P. 66
Negotiation
CULTURE INFLUENCES THE WAY THE NEGOTIATOR and priorities. For example, individualist cultures
might inspire the negotiator to seek self-interest,
PRIORITISES HIS OR HER INTERESTS, AND while more collectivist cultures could inspire the
CULTURE ALSO DICTATES HOW THE NEGOTIATOR negotiator to seek objectives that would satisfy
the interests of not just the individual but also
ASKS FOR WHAT HE OR SHE IS SEEKING.
of the community as a whole.
a better price with the vendor. You will get a The following table sets out different cultural
lower price only if the vendor reduces his or prototypes and their impact:
her price expectations. Competitive negotiations
are also known as positional bargaining because
of the excessive focus on positions during such
Cultural prototype Impact on negotiation
negotiations. On the other hand, collaborative
In a collectivist culture, negotiators are likely to negotiate for
negotiations are also known as interest-based common objectives. In such a culture, it is more common to
negotiations or integrative negotiations because negotiate in teams rather than alone. Also in a collectivist culture,
Collectivist vs. individualist there may be aversion to direct confrontation.
the focus is not really on asking the counterpart cultures In an individualist culture, on the other hand, negotiators are likely
to focus more on individual goals and individual gains. In the case of
to reduce his or her expectations but, rather, the
such a culture, there are more possibilities of direct confrontation
IRFXV LV RQ ÀQGLQJ WKH EHVW VROXWLRQ WKDW ZLOO during negotiation.
actually improve the payoff of both parties.
Low-context cultures prefer the direct exchange of messages and
&XOWXUHV LQÁXHQFH WKH ZD\ ZH EHKDYH DQG sharing of information. High-context cultures share information
indirectly and meaning is embedded in many messages. As a result,
also the way we assess other people’s behaviour. Low-context vs. high-context in low-context cultures, sharing information is easier as well as
cultures
Hence, culture has a strong impact on negotia- more direct. In contrast, sharing information is more complicated in
high-context cultures, and both negotiations and decision-making
tions. Each culture has a cognitive component tend to take longer.
and a normative component. A culture’s cogni-
In hierarchical cultures, power distances are greater. As a result,
tive component deals primarily with the different negotiation is possible when power distances have been reduced.
values that the culture espouses. These values This is why negotiations are more likely to be held in teams. In
Hierarchical vs. egalitarian egalitarian cultures, it is easier to hold negotiations. Negotiations in
affect our understanding and judgment of what cultures egalitarian culture tend to end more quickly as individual
decision-making is assumed. In hierarchical cultures, there is a
is acceptable and what is not, what is right and
tendency to refer to higher authorities and, as a result, negotiations
what is wrong and so on. On the other hand, tend to take longer.
the normative component of a culture outlines
common rules of behaviour: how to sit, how to
greet people, how to eat, what to say, what not to
say, etc. Rules and norms are outlined by culture. East vs. West and Beyond
Let us try to understand in detail why and how Traditionally the world was seen as East vs.
FXOWXUH LQÁXHQFHV QHJRWLDWRUV West. The Western hemisphere had a uniform
&XOWXUHV LQÁXHQFH QHJRWLDWLRQ VWUDWHJLHV LQ concept of the East and vice versa. However,
th
WZR ZD\V &XOWXUH LQÁXHQFHV WKH ZD\ WKH QHJR- in the 20 century this prototype was replaced
tiator prioritises his or her interests, and culture by a more East-middle-West cultural proto-
also dictates how the negotiator asks for what he type. Cultural psychologists divide the world
or she is seeking. When negotiators are involved into three prototypes and each one has a strong
in the process of exchanging information, a bearing on negotiations. These culture types are
range of behaviours is possible. However, these dignity culture (Western culture), face culture
EHKDYLRXUV DUH GHHSO\ LQÁXHQFHG E\ FXOWXUH (East Asian culture) and honour culture (Middle
For example, confrontation is a typical nego- Eastern, Southeast Asian and Latin American
tiation behaviour but, while in some cultures cultures). Jeanne M. Brett in her seminal work
direct verbal confrontation is considered to be a Negotiating Globally (2001; third edition, 2014)
normal part of negotiation behaviour, in others argues that these culture types can be described:
verbal confrontation is not an option. Similarly, “in terms of six sets of characteristics:
VRPH FXOWXUHV LQÁXHQFH WKH QHJRWLDWRU·V LQWHUHVWV self-worth, power and status, sensitivity
66 The European Business Review January - February 2018