Page 45 - BBC History - September 2017
P. 45

The gospel truth?

               An eclipse may o!er us a clue
                    a
       3 s to the date of Jesus’s death                              Halley’s Comet races
                                                                       across the sky, as
        One of the most important events in Christian tradition    depicted in the Bayeux
        is the crucifixion of Jesus. But the New Testament is      tapestry. Within months,
        frustratingly short on historical detail. The crucifixion   Harold II would be dead
        took place during the reign of the Roman emperor
        Tiberius (AD 14–37). But when exactly?
          The Gospel of St Luke tells us that John the Baptist         Halley’s conquest
        began his teaching in the 15th year of Tiberius, which
        must be c29 AD. Later, Luke tells us that, at the time of   4
                                                                       A comet in 1066 spelled doom for
        the crucifixion, “there was a darkness over all the
        Earth” which lasted from the sixth to the ninth hour,                the English (at least that’s what the
        also mentioned in the Gospels of Matthew and Mark.                  Normans would have us believe)
          Luke goes on to specify that “the sun was
        darkened”. That sounds like an eclipse – and there was   The trouble with treating a   for a week, it was described by
        one. It took place on 24 November AD 29 and passed     celestial phenomenon as an   some as the “long-haired star”.
        through Syria and Iraq. It wasn’t total in Judaea, but it   omen is the question of who the   According to the Bayeux
        would have been very nearly so.                        omen is meant for, and whether   tapestry, this long-haired star
          Coincidence? Perhaps. It certainly complicates the   it is a good or bad one. The most   spelled bad news for poor
        chronology, because if Luke was referring to the       reliable answers generally come   Harold II. As his compatriots
        eclipse of November AD 29 when describing the          afterwards.                look up at the comet with
        crucifixion, he was leaving less than a year for John     Halley’s Comet returns every   wonder, the English king
        to complete his teaching and Jesus to perform his      75–76 years. But it wasn’t until   is portrayed being warned
        ministry. Perhaps Matthew, Mark and Luke were          1705 that the English astronomer   by a figure, presumably an
        using their memory of the eclipse of AD 29 to add      Edmond Halley realised that,   astrologer, that the comet
        symbolism to their accounts.
                                                               since a comet had been     is an omen of doom.
                                                               regularly reported at that   William I, on the other hand,
                                                               interval, it must be the same   regarded it as a positive portent
                                                               one. One of those occasions   – though that, of course, was in
                                                               was in 1066, the Anglo-Saxon   retrospect. A few scenes later,
                                                               Chronicle announcing that,   the future Conqueror is shown
                                                               around Easter time, “a portent   building his armada, buoyed
                                                               such as men had never seen   up with celestially inspired
                                                               was seen in the heavens”. Visible   confidence.



                                                                      Drowning in bad luck
                                                               5

                                                                      An eclipse in 1133 took the blame
                                                                           for a string of calamities to strike
                                                                           12th-century England

                                                               Henry I’s death on 1 December 1135 was a challenging time for
                                                               England. His son William had been drowned in the White Ship
                                                               disaster of 1120. His first wife was already dead, and his second,
                                                               Adeliza, whom he had married in 1121, had borne him no children.
                                                                 Henry was left only with his daughter Matilda, the Holy Roman
                                                               Empress. Surely she could bring the royal family a little luck? Well,
                                                               no, actually. The baronry and the church were appalled by the
                                                               prospect of a woman ruling England in her own right, and their
                                                               disaffection crystallised in the figure of Henry’s nephew Stephen
                                                               of Blois who, following Henry’s death in 1135, seized the English
                                                               throne. What followed was 19 years of civil war, a period of
                                                               turbulence that’s now remembered as the Anarchy.
                                                                 So what was the cause of this ill fortune? According to the Anglo-
                                                               Saxon Chronicle, you needed to look no further than the celestial
      AKG-IMAGES/GETTY IMAGES  An 18th-century painting of a solar and lunar    There was indeed an eclipse on 2 August, passing over northern
                                                               event that, it says, occurred four months earlier, on 2 August 1135,
                                                               when “the light of the day was eclipsed” as Henry sailed to France.
                                                               Britain and central Europe – but in 1133! Perhaps the 1133 eclipse
                                                               was just too good a story for the Chronicle to miss. Or maybe, by
                                                               the time the Chronicle was written down, the two events had been
             eclipse described in the New Testament
                                                               unconsciously conflated.

       BBC History Magazine                                                                                         45
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50