Page 174 - Crisis in Higher Education
P. 174

Becoming Student-Centered  •  145



               2. Plans of study: Being student centered means that students must have
                  plans of study to identify what courses to take and when to take them
                  in order to complete their degree on time and without paying for
                  unneeded courses.
               3. Student-centered learning: It is time to circle back and address this
                 notion, which is designed to cope with the different ways students
                 acquire knowledge. If learning can be tailored to match the needs of
                 individual students, they can learn more in less time and use fewer
                 resources, making education more efficient, thereby reducing costs.
               4. Student evaluations of teaching: Being student centered has increased
                 the incidence of student evaluations and given credence to their use
                 in assessing faculty for contract renewal, promotion, and tenure. It
                 seems reasonable and logical for students to have a role in evaluating
                 faculty teaching, but it must be done so that academic standards are
                 maintained.






             7.1   UNDERSTANDING THE COST IMPACTS
                 OF BEING STUDENT-CENTERED

             Construction on university campuses boomed, as the growth in demand
             for higher education combined with efforts to become student centered.
             Students who stepped on campuses in the late 1940s, the 1950s, the 1960s,
             and even the 1970s would find today’s campuses unrecognizable. Although
             it is difficult to know whether spending on facilities and amenities has
             gone too far, there are prominent people who believe that it has. Robert
             Reich, former U.S. Secretary of Labor and Professor of Public Policy at the
             University of California at Berkeley, claims that universities are spending
             on unnecessary programs and campus perks often at the expense of hir-
             ing faculty. These facilities and amenities are very expensive, contribute
             to escalating costs, and have little to do with educating students. Some
             universities are showcasing their value through impressive dining halls,
             palatial new buildings, and fancy student unions, which have little to do
             with the quality of education.  Some administrators defend the practice
                                        2
             by claiming that facilities are often funded by major gifts from donors
                                                                    2
             and do not consume tuition dollars or other operating funds.  There are
             two rebuttals. Each new building must be heated, cleaned, and main-
             tained, which adds to operating expenses. Second, it is possible, maybe
   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179