Page 182 - Crisis in Higher Education
P. 182

Becoming Student-Centered  •  153



               2. Measure teaching effectiveness by student performance: Assessing the
                  teaching effectiveness of instructional faculty is no longer done with
                  student evaluations. Rather, it is accomplished by pretesting and
                  posttesting each student. A subject matter pretest is given during the
                  first class to determine the students’ level of competence. The final
                  examination measures what students know at the end, and the dif-
                  ference between the two is what the students have learned. Both the
                  final exam, which is an absolute learning standard, and the differ-
                  ence between the two tests, which is a relative standard, are used
                  to assess the teaching performance of instructional faculty. This
                  approach is useful for tenured and professional faculty as well.
               3. Gather different student input: Student evaluations are still used,
                 but they no longer ask questions such as: How much have stu-
                 dents learned? Was the faculty member a good teacher? Did the
                 students like the faculty member? Asking most 18- to 22-year-old
                 students about these issues presupposes that they have some idea
                 of what they should learn, when in fact they have limited knowl-
                 edge about what they need to know to compete for good jobs at
                 graduation. The revised student evaluation gathers feedback on
                 the following:
                 a.  Student experiences, including what learning tools would help
                     them learn faster and easier. This relates to student-centered
                     learning and the seven learning styles, so the evaluation might
                     ask if and how they used specific tools and were these effective.
                 b.  Faculty performance, which should emphasize things students
                     can readily and reliably assess. Were students treated courteously
                     and respectfully? Did the instructor provide clear and prompt
                     feedback on performance? Did the instructor arrive on time?
                     Was the instructor well prepared? Students can provide mean-
                     ingful feedback about treatment and process, and their answers
                     can be part of the instructors’ evaluation.






             7.5  DRIVING FORCES FOR CHANGE

             Some of the changes are within the control of universities, so government,
             students, parents, other family members, and friends should be provid-
             ing the pressure. If universities want to attract more students, they must
   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187