Page 219 - Crisis in Higher Education
P. 219

190  •  Crisis in Higher Education



             9.3.2.5   Veteran Education Benefits and General-
                    Purpose Appropriations

             As shown in Table 9.3, the remaining two parts of federal government sup-
             port are for veterans and a special allocation for military schools, historical
             black colleges, and land grant universities. Veterans’ educational benefits
             are an important part of defense spending. Allocations to military schools
             are also defense related as they help to prepare future leaders. Special fund-
             ing for minority and historically black colleges should continue. Special
             funding for land grant universities no longer seems necessary.




             9.3.2.6  Problems with Private, For-Profit Universities
             For-profit universities receive funds from the federal government but not
             from states and local governments. These institutions have major prob-
             lems. Table 3.1 in Chapter 3 shows that private, for-profit universities
             have by far the worst four-year and six-year graduation rates at 22.5% and
             31.5%, respectively. The same rates for public universities are 33.5% and
             57.7%.  Looking at the six-year rate, public universities are 26.2 points
                  14
             higher (57.7% minus 31.5%), which yields 83% more graduates.
              Other problems have been reported.  The Atlantic claims that pri-
             vate, for-profit institutions have made headlines for poor performance,
             high prices, and exploiting vulnerable, low-income students as well as
             veterans who often bring with them a rich financial aid package.  The
                                                                        38
             New York Times reports that the Obama administration has decided to
             bar ITT Educational Services from using federal financial aid to enroll
             new students. ITT received an estimated $580 million in federal fund-
             ing for higher education in 2015. 39–41  In addition, the U.S. Department
             of Education has moved to close the largest accreditor of for-profit col-
             leges, which oversaw failing institutions like Corinthian Colleges and ITT
             Technical Institute. 42–45  One advantage for state and local governments is
             that their funds are not available to private, for-profit universities.
               These instances do not mean that all private, for-profit universities have
             similar problems, but buyers should beware. The best way to improve
             conditions is for consumers to investigate alternatives and chose the best
             one. This is facilitated by creating a HEPO database, which is described in
             Chapter 6. It should include reliable information about price, graduation
             rates, completion time, passing certification and licensure exams, and job
             placement.
   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224