Page 319 - Crisis in Higher Education
P. 319

Creating High-Technology Learning Materials  •  289



                 and could be presented with a similar problem that has new data.
                 This could happen over and over at the student’s request. This mech-
                 anism, which can be thought of as part of a study guide, would do
                 more than provide the correct answer and responses to frequently
                 asked questions. This tool would take the student to the place in the
                 e-book that describes how to work the problem, show the steps in the
                 solution, and have a link to an online video that shows how to solve
                 the problem, including common errors.
               3. Sample tests: Using the mechanisms from items 1 and 2 in this list,
                 timed tests can be generated that students could take to assess their
                 overall knowledge.
               4. PowerPoint slide deck: These are usually available with traditional
                 textbooks, but the new versions would be heavily noted so students
                 seeking better explanations could find them as part of the PowerPoint
                 slides. In addition, there would be links from the PowerPoint slides
                 to the e-book that would provide more insights and explanations.
               5. Mechanisms for reading to students: Students must be able to listen
                 to e-books on a variety of mobile devices. This can be organized by
                 topic so students can pick topics in any order or in the recommended
                 sequence.






             13.4  CREATING HIGH-TECH LECTURES
             Like creating high-tech reading materials, changing how knowledge is
             transferred from faculty to students must be done so it costs less and,
             more importantly, so students learn more. Overall cost declines because
             the upfront investment to digitized lectures is far less than continuing
             savings from higher faculty productivity. In the process, less expensive
             instructional faculty and graduate teaching assistants are used to staff
             general education and disciplinary core courses that do not require the
             skill, knowledge, and experience of tenured and professional faculty.
             The notion of using less expensive faculty is part of the current system,
             but universities often rely too heavily on these substitutes and/or use them
             inappropriately by assigning them to teach upper-level undergraduate and
             graduate courses.
              The essence of efforts to use tenured and professional faculty more pro-
             ductively is centered on the creation of downloadable, electronic lectures
   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324