Page 76 - Crisis in Higher Education
P. 76

50  •  Crisis in Higher Education



               2. Environment: This is 20% of the evaluation, and it is measured by
                  female participation both as students and faculty, diversity, data
                  quality, a supportive policy environment, and how well the univer-
                  sity system meets the needs of a competitive economy. The United
                  States ranked first, followed closely by several countries.
               3. Connectivity: This is 20% of the evaluation, and it is measured by
                 the proportion of international students, joint research with faculty
                 from other countries, open-access articles on the Web, and knowl-
                 edge  transfer  and  joint  research  with  industry.  The  United  States
                 ranked 14th in connectivity, falling behind in collaboration with
                 international researchers. This lag may be explained by the fact that
                 the United States is a research leader in many areas of science, tech-
                 nology, engineering, and business, and it may not see collaboration
                 as beneficial.
               4. Output: This is 40% of the evaluation, and it is measured by sev-
                 eral items that assess research output, enrollment and graduates as
                 a percent of the population, and the unemployment rate for gradu-
                 ates. Most of these items are adjusted for population size. However,
                 the total number of research articles published by higher education
                 institutions, which is one quarter of the 40%, is not per capita. This
                 helps to explain why the United States achieves first place in the
                 Output area by a wide margin. The United Kingdom, which is sec-
                 ond, trails by more than 30%. 7


               The Universitas 21 study goes further and adjusts its ranking for the
             stage of economic development of each country using GDP per capita.
             This provided an expected value for each variable, given a nation’s level
             of income, which effectively reduces the ranking of countries like the
             United States (16th place) and elevating countries like China (5th place)
             and India (15th place). In this overall adjusted ranking, the United
             States is also behind the United Kingdom (1st place), Serbia (2nd place),
             Finland (6th place), South Africa (7th place), Portugal (8th place), and
             New Zealand (9th place). 7


             3.1.2  Instructional Quality

             When drilling down on quality, students have one overwhelming com-
             plaint: this or that faculty member is a poor teacher. The problem is often,
             although not always, associated with inexperienced faculty. After all,
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81