Page 30 - Was Hitler a Riddle?
P. 30

The British Diplomats  17

            of retribution by senior officials in the Foreign Office who might not ap-
            preciate his strong opinions. Certainly some of his most notable dispatches
            after January 30, 1933, did not mince words.
              For the first two years of his stay in Berlin, rumbold largely ignored
            Hitler and the Nazi movement. His predecessors had paid some attention
            to the political upstart as early as 1920, soon after he made his appearance
            on the political scene, but with few exceptions, their assessments were not
            strikingly profound. they recognized that Hitler was a central figure in the
            National socialist movement and thought of him as a “bulwark against
            Communism,” which had come to power in russia and was much feared
            in British political circles. there was one exception to these mundane com-
            ments, a perceptive dispatch by the British consul in Munich, robert t.
            smallbones, a name that will appear again in this study. in a short, incisive
            dispatch of september 28, 1920, smallbones noted that the leaders of the
            National socialist Party, adolf Hitler and anton drexler, were effective or-
            ganizers committed to three central ideas: anti-semitism, the use of force
            in furthering political goals, and the merging of socialism and nationalism.
            smallbones surmised that the new party was funded by a circle of indus-
            trialists close to Hugo stinnes, a wealthy entrepreneur with pronounced
            right-wing  views.  astutely,  smallbones  predicted  that  the  industrialists
            would not have to fear Hitler’s talk of socialism because the central idea of
            his movement was nationalism. 4
              toward the end of 1922, other British diplomats in Germany had col-
            lected many details about Hitler, but these did not add up to a coherent
            evaluation of his potential as a leader. after November 1922, they often
            referred to him as the “Bavarian Mussolini,” an incorrect designation that
            did not reveal much about the man. None of these assessments was based
            on personal contact; apparently, throughout the 1920s no British diplomat
            stationed in Berlin or Munich had made any effort to speak to Hitler.  in
                                                                       5
            truth, there was no reason at that time to devote much time or thought to
            him; he was not expected to rise to the heights of political power.
              Only in 1930, when Hitler had demonstrated his ability to gain mass
            support for his program—in a national election his vote jumped from 2.6
            percent to 18.3 percent of the total, and his party secured 107 out of 577
            reichstag representatives—did rumbold pay serious attention to Nazism,
            but he showed little understanding of Germany’s dire political condition
            following the catastrophic depression that had hit the country in 1929, or
            of the nature of Nazism. in 1931, he was certain that the country would
            not “fail to master its difficulties.” after the presidential election of april
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35