Page 116 - Eclipse of God
P. 116

Religion and Ethics  89

            on European soil, in Greece. The philosophical expression of
            this crisis is known by the name of Sophistry. Its most char-
            acteristic criticism attacks the connection between the ethical
            and the absolute by calling in question, from the standpoint of
            biological facts, the cosmos as a unified pattern. The heavenly
            bodies may indeed appear to us to be in that perfect agreement
            which a chorus of Aeschylus calls “the harmony of Zeus”; but
            where life is, another law rules, according to which the strong
            dispose of the weak. A few Sophists, the radically individu-
            alistic among them, conclude from this that the right of the
            strong is valid even within human society, but most of them
            defend the law of society, which unites the weak into a pow-
            erful body. Human society determines what is good and just;
            it does so on the basis of what is useful to it. Rather, since
            not one single society but many and varied societies exist, one
            should say that societies behave thus. The good is therefore not
            one and consistent, it is “variegated and manifold.” In other
            words, there are only changing customs and manners, values
            and regulations; there is no primordial function of assent and
            dissent, inherent in Being itself, which underlies all this variety
            and manifoldness and, in fact, makes it possible. “Man,” sums
            up the greatest of the Sophists, “is the measure of all things.”
               It is as a protest against this relativizing of all values that
            we must understand Plato’s doctrine of Ideas. It is the great
            attempt of ancient thought to restore the connection of the
            ethical with the Absolute and thus allow the concrete acting
            man to meet once again the primal ground of Being. In line
            with this intention Plato formulated at the end of his path, as
            an exact counterpart to the saying of Protagoras, the opposing
            statement, “God is the measure of all things.” Once the belief
            common to the early cultures of the Orient in a unity of the
            universe representing what is right had been upset and na-
            ture had been split into a harmonious cosmos and a discordant
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121