Page 76 - Eclipse of God
P. 76

The Love of God and the Idea of Deity  49

            Reason, from the Sources of Judaism,” Cohen returns to this
            problem with even greater prominence: “How can one love an
            idea?”— and replies, “How can one love anything save an idea?”
            He substantiates his reply by saying, “For even in the love of
            the senses one loves only the idealized person, only the idea
            of the person.” Yet even if it were correct that in the love of
            “the senses” (or more correctly, in the love which comprehends
            sensuality) one loves only the idealized person, that does not
            at all mean that nothing more than the idea of the person is
            loved; even the idealized person remains a person, and has not
            been transformed into an idea. It is only because the person
            whom I idealize actually exists that I can love the idealized
            one. Even though for Dante it was la gloriosa donna della mia
            mente, yet the decisive fact is that first he saw the real Beatrice,
            who set the “spirit of life” trembling in him. But does not the
            motive force which enables and empowers us to idealize a be-
            loved person arise from the deepest substance of that beloved
            person? Is not the true idealization in the deepest sense a dis-
            covery of the essential self meant by God in creating the person
            whom I love?
               “The love of men for God,” says Cohen, “is the love of the
            moral ideal. I can love only the ideal, and I can comprehend
            the ideal in no other way save by loving it.” Even on this level,
            the very highest for the philosopher who is overwhelmed by
            faith, he declares what the love of God is, and not what it in-
            cludes. But man’s love for God is not love of the moral ideal; it
            only includes that love. He who loves God only as the moral
            ideal is bound soon to reach the point of despair at the con-
            duct of the world where, hour after hour, all the principles of
            his moral idealism are apparently contradicted. Job despairs
            because God and the moral ideal seem diverse to him. But
            He who answered Job out of the tempest is more exalted even
            than the ideal sphere. He is not the archetype of the ideal, but
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81