Page 76 - The Economist Asia January 2018
P. 76

The Economist January 27th 2018
           60 Finance and economics
             2 vestment banking itself is less important  com bubble (by Smith Barney, whose rem-  But mortgages and otherloans to clients, fi-
              these days, accounting for about half the  nants were picked up in the Citi acquisi-  nanced by deposits, are a second, fast-
              overall business. In contrast the firm’s  tion). That, he suggested, might mean they  growing one. The loans are backed by the
              wealth-management income has grown  were peaking. In response, Steven Chubak,  borrowers’ securities holdings, helping ex-
              sharply since the crisis, and has become  an analyst at Instinet, a broker, created  plain why credit losses to date have been
              even more central to its operations since it  side-by-side comparisons of the two busi-  almost non-existent. Attracting deposits is
              bought into Citigroup’s wealth-manage-  nesses to illustrate how much their ap-  not as hard as might be expected from the
              mentbusinessin 2009. Controversial then,  proaches differed. Three-quarters of Smith  affluent customers Morgan Stanley pur-
              the move appeared foolish  a year later  Barney’s revenues, compared with a fifth  sues. Ofcourse they already have bank ac-
              when the process ofintegration faltered.  of Morgan Stanley’s, came from transac-  counts, but many conventional retail
                It is now cited as an obvious and unre-  tions, ie, from commissions on stock and  banks pay almost no interest, are starting
              peatable opportunity. Revenues and pro-  bond sales, and so were highly volatile.  to charge forcurrentaccountsand, in effect,
              fits have grown quickly. Margins, Mr Gor-  The emphasis since has shifted.  are encouragingclients to lookelsewhere.
              man said, had reached levels only ever  Fees charged as a percentage of assets  As this trove of information grows, giv-
              achieved bya brokerin 1999 duringthe dot-  are the most important source of income.  ing Morgan Stanley data on clients’ in-  1


               Buttonwood             The times they aren’t a-changing



               Volatilityhas been low, and thatencourages risk-taking
                   AY YOU live in boring times. Finan-                             short spikes in the form of crises (see
              Mcial markets have become dull, if   That eerie calm…                chart). So lowvolatilitytodayisnot neces-
               profitable. The S&P 500 index, America’s  CBOE volatility index (VIX)  sarily a warning sign. The authors write:
               leading equity benchmark, has notched                               “On average, extremely low volatility to-
               up its longest-ever streak without a 5% re-                   80    day predicts low volatility in the future,
               versal. Bond yields may have inched up                              not higher.”
               in recent months, but are still at the bot-                  60       However, the Vix measures the im-
               tom of historical ranges. Institutions  Over 30 indicates a high    plied volatility over just a one-month ho-
                                                   level of uncertainty
               famed for their trading prowess, such as                      40    rizon. It is possible to calculate implied
               Goldman Sachs, have seen profits dented                       30     volatility over a two-year period, creating
               by the quiescence ofthe markets.                             20     a slope akin to the yield curve, which
                 This lack of market volatility owes                               measures interest rates for different lend-
               much to the steadiness of monetary poli-  Long-term average         ingdurations. Backin 2006-07 thisvolatil-
               cy since the depths of the financial crisis.  1990  95  2000  05  10  15 18  0  ity curve was very flat, suggesting that in-
               Central banks have kept short-term rates                            vestors thought that conditions would
               low and have intervened to push down  Source: Thomson Reuters       continue to be rosy. That may explain
               bond yields through their programmes of                             why so many were caught out by the pro-
               quantitative easing (QE). The classic  given price within a set period. The price,  blems in the subprime mortgage market.
               method ofpricingfinancial assetsis to say  or premium, they pay for this option re-  This time, the Fed says the volatility
               theyare worth the discounted value offu-  flects a lot of factors. But one of the most  curve is steeply upward-sloping (since
               ture cashflows; since central banks have  important is how choppy investors expect  1996 the slope has been steeper only 15%
               kept the discount rate steady, prices have  the market to be in future. This measure is  of the time). This suggests that investors
               been steady too.                 the “implied” volatility of the market and  are not complacent at all, and think that
                 The late Hyman  Minsky,  an econo-  isthe basisforthe well-known Vix, or vola-  volatility may soon return. Investors
               mist, thought that long booms sowed the  tility index.              seem to think the Vix may be as high as
               seedsoftheirown destruction. He argued  Speculators who believe markets will  20% (compared with around 11% today)
               that, when the economy was doing well,  stay calm can sell (or “write”) options on  within the next one ortwo years.
               investorstended to take more risk(such as  volatility, earning premium income. The  The obvious catalyst for such a change
               taking on more debt). These speculative  more sellers there are, the more the price,  is monetary policy. The Fed is pushing up
               positions are vulnerable to a shock, such  orpremium, will fall (and the lowerthe Vix  interest rates and slowly unwinding QE;
               as a sudden rise in interest rates, which  will be). The danger, then, is that a sudden  the European Central Bankis scaling back
               can turn into a fully fledged crisis.  pickup in volatility could result in specula-  its bond-buying. So far, this process has
                 In these daysofsophisticated markets,  tors suffering losses. A linked issue is that  occurred without any great alarms. But
               speculators are not restricted to their own  investment banks use a measure called  there may yet be a “tipping point”, when
               capital oreven to borrowed moneyto buy  “value at risk” to help determine the size of  higher rates cause problems for investors
               assets to bet on the good times continu-  their trading positions; reduced volatility  and borrowers. In any cycle there is al-
               ing. They can use derivative instruments  will encourage them to  take more risk.  ways some institution that has taken a lot
               to bet on prices. Indeed, there is actually a  Since volatility tends to rise when asset  more risk than the rest. If a storm comes
               market in volatility.            prices are falling, this could be accompa-  this year, the world will discoverwho has
                 The steadiness of the S&P 500 shows  nied by much widerfinancial distress.  gone out without a coat orumbrella.
               that actual, orrealised, volatility has been  Two recent papers* from the New York  ...............................................................
               low. Butinvestorscan also hedge against a  Federal Reserve have examined this issue.  *“The low volatility puzzle: are investors complacent?”
               sharp move in the stockmarket (in either  The authors point out that low volatility  and “Is this time different?” by David Lucca, Daniel
               direction) by taking out an option, giving  tends to be persistent; historical data show  Roberts and Peter Van Tassel
               them the right to buy or sell equities at a  long periods of calm interspersed with  Economist.com/blogs/buttonwood
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81