Page 18 - 'Blast_Into_Math
P. 18

Blast into Math!                        Pure mathematics: the proof of the pudding is in the eating



               and

                                                 x =2 =⇒ 2+ x =4,


               which we can write as


                                                 2+ x =4 ⇐⇒ x =2,


               because the implication is true in both directions.


               Definition 2.3.3. The statements A and B are equivalent if both A =⇒ B  and B =⇒ A , and we write


                                                        A  ⇔  B.


               In plain English two statements are equivalent if they have the same meaning. Another way to say that
               the statements A and B are equivalent is:


                        A if and only if B,



               which is often abbreviated


                        A iff B.


               It is often not obvious that two statements have the same meaning. For example, to see that


                                                 2+ x =4 ⇐⇒ x =2,


               we should check both directions:


                     1.  2+ x =4 implies x =2, and
                     2.  x =2 implies 2+ x =4.



               To verify that two statements are equivalent we should always carefully check that both directions are true.


               When a statement is false, then its negation is true.


               Definition 2.3.4. The negation of a statement is a statement which has the opposite meaning. For a statement
               A, we write “not A” to indicate the negation of A. The negation of a statement is the statement that must
               be true if the original statement is false.


               Let’s practice negating statements.





                                                           18
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23