Page 18 - 'Blast_Into_Math
P. 18
Blast into Math! Pure mathematics: the proof of the pudding is in the eating
and
x =2 =⇒ 2+ x =4,
which we can write as
2+ x =4 ⇐⇒ x =2,
because the implication is true in both directions.
Definition 2.3.3. The statements A and B are equivalent if both A =⇒ B and B =⇒ A , and we write
A ⇔ B.
In plain English two statements are equivalent if they have the same meaning. Another way to say that
the statements A and B are equivalent is:
A if and only if B,
which is often abbreviated
A iff B.
It is often not obvious that two statements have the same meaning. For example, to see that
2+ x =4 ⇐⇒ x =2,
we should check both directions:
1. 2+ x =4 implies x =2, and
2. x =2 implies 2+ x =4.
To verify that two statements are equivalent we should always carefully check that both directions are true.
When a statement is false, then its negation is true.
Definition 2.3.4. The negation of a statement is a statement which has the opposite meaning. For a statement
A, we write “not A” to indicate the negation of A. The negation of a statement is the statement that must
be true if the original statement is false.
Let’s practice negating statements.
18