Page 82 - Amateur Photographer - August 5, 2017
P. 82

Photo Critique


                         Final Analysis





                               Roger Hicks considers…

                               ‘Girl with Hat’, by Xiomara Bender                                           © XIOMARA BENDER















































          t’s hard to believe this picture was   strangest of them all. There is presumably   white. Did I choose it because I ‘see’ in
          taken in the last few years, but   some Korean cultural tradition that   black & white? I don’t think so. Rather, I
          Xiomara Bender’s book, North   involves pretty girls wearing improbable   think, I chose it because it is outside time;
     I Korea: The Power of Dreams       hats, but in a sense it doesn’t really matter   because it is so unlike anything I have
     (Kehrer Verlag 2017) is illustrated across   what it is: the picture lives and dies by its   seen or can readily imagine seeing. Why,
     the course of three trips beginning in 2012.  own strangeness.        for that matter, did the photographer
      If someone told you it was taken in the   It’s quite easy to criticise: the cropped   choose black & white? Was it merely a
     1950s, or even the 1920s, you would not be  fi gure on the left, the strange light on the   practical consideration: avoiding, for
     very surprised. Partly, of course, this is   older woman’s face, the sprig-like object in  example, the gaudy colours, verging on
     because of the strange time warp that is   the lower right-hand corner. But without   garish and gimcrack, that seem so popular
     North Korea. For a biological parallel,   its ‘faults’, it would be sterile: a crop would  in Korea? Or what?
     albeit on a timescale a million times   lose context, never mind charm. Likewise,   It would be easy to persuade oneself
     longer, consider the coelacanth. People call  the way the girl is looking away is an   that this picture didn’t fi t in the book; or
     it a ‘living fossil’, but this is only a part   essential part of the picture. We see her   perhaps, anywhere. Quite apart from the
     truth. Today’s coelacanths are not the   the way the photographer saw her, the way  ‘fl aws’ above, there is a popular and often
     same as the fi sh of 65 million years ago;   we would have seen her if we had been   justifi ed prejudice against mixing black &
     which was when, until 1938, they were   there. It’s very much the way we see; or   white and colour. But again, it doesn’t
     thought to have become extinct.    at least, the way I see.           matter. It’s a question of (justifi ed)
      This ‘time-warp evolution’ is what gives   Which is an interesting question in   self-confi dence, of the photographer
     her book its fascinating alien quality, and   itself. Of the 11 of Bender’s pictures I could  believing in her own work; which is
     why I chose this picture as possibly the   have used, this was the only one in black &  something we all need.

     Roger Hicks has been writing about photography since 1981 and has published more than three dozen books on the subject, many in partnership with his wife Frances Schultz (visit his new website
     at www.rogerandfrances.eu). Every week in this column Roger deconstructs a classic or contemporary photograph. Next week he considers an image by Sibylle Bergemann

     82                                                       5 August 2017 I www.amateurphotographer.co.uk I subscribe 0330 333 1113
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84