Page 58 - All About History 58 - 2017 UK
P. 58

What if…



                    Attila the Hun



               had survived his




                 wedding night?





          While not the bloodthirsty conqueror the Romans painted

        him as, the Hunnic emperor’s enduring presence would have

                 shifted the balance of power and redrawn Europe

                                           Written by Jonathan O’Callaghan

        How important was Attila the Hun in the                    territory the Huns regarded as quintessential
        history of the Hunnic Empire?                              to their empire, then you come to more distant
                                            INTERVIEW WITH…
        Some say he was the only thing that held the               regions where the levying of tribute was
                                                                   enough. The Romans fell into that category.
        whole creaky structure of the Hunnic Empire  DR HYUN JIM KIM
        together in the middle of the 5th century. But   A senior lecturer   In 447 CE, Attila invaded the Eastern
        my view is a little bit different.            in Classics at the   Roman Empire and annexed a huge chunk
          I think the Huns inherited quite a          University of   of the Balkans. But then immediately
                                                      Melbourne, Dr
        sophisticated political model — even before   Hyun Jim Kim is   afterwards, he negotiated to give it back
        Attila came to the throne, it was already in   an expert on all   because he wasn’t interested in territory. What
        place — so he was the last powerful king of a   things Attila. He   he was interested in was getting a steady flow
                                                      is the author of
        united Hunnic states, who inherited political   The Huns, Rome and the Birth of   of tributes, which would enhance his prestige
        powers from his predecessor. He was more of a   Europe and other books examining   among the Hunnic elite. The objective wasn’t
                                            the Hunnic Empire and Asia’s role
        cautious leader, not that aggressive despite the   in the fall of Rome.  to bleed the Romans dry — it was to gain
        literature that portrays him as a megalomaniac             prestige. This was necessary because Attila
        seeking world conquest.                        was a usurper [he had killed his brother to become the sole
          In fact, if you look carefully at what he does, he is very   ruler of the Huns].
        cautious in battle. Instead of seeking to conquer the Roman
        Empire and create a huge territory like the Mongols, for   Was he trying to conquer Europe?
        example, he tried to levy tribute from the Eastern and   Priscus, one of the primary sources on Attila’s reign, says
        Western Romans. He was a very traditional Hunnic king, in   his objective was nothing less than the conquest of half of
        my opinion. His invasions were designed not to conquer the   the Roman Empire. Of course the Romans would have felt
        Roman Empire, but to subject the Romans to the payment of   it like that — they wouldn’t have thought an invasion of that
        tribute in order to build an inner Asian tributary empire.   magnitude could be anything but an outright conquest. But
                                                       what’s curious is that when the Huns invaded, they would
        Was Attila’s rule different to his predecessors?  sack cities, try to extract tribute from them and then just
        The Huns had two kings, who ruled over the two halves of   withdraw again after a major battle or great siege.
        the empire. The Eastern King was normally superior of the   I would say Attila’s motivation was to force the Romans into
        Western king. But Attila staged a coup and overthrew his   a tributary system as he understood it. In fact, at the time of
        brother in the East, and the power equation was reversed.   his death, he was planning another invasion of the Eastern
        That caused all kinds of problems later, and it was part of the   Roman Empire because the incumbent Roman emperor of
        reason the Hunnic state imploded after Attila died, because   the East, Marcian, had refused to pay the tribute that his
        the East refused to accept subordination to the West, and it   predecessor had promised.
        started a civil war.
                                                       What do we know about Attila’s death around 453 CE?
        What was his plan leading up to his death?     Well this comes solely from Priscus. Attila had many wives
        He wanted to force the Romans, the Eastern and Western   and he took another one [named Ildico]. After cavorting during
        half, to pay tribute to him. What the Huns would do was   his wedding night and drinking too much, he burst a vein and
                                                                                                             The Romans feared
        conquer outright states close to them, so the Germanic tribes   choked on his own blood. In the morning when the Hunnic   that Attila would
        were directly ruled by the Huns. But once you go beyond the   nobles realised something was wrong, they rushed in and   not rest until he had
                                                                                                             conquered Europe


     58
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63