Page 134 - Composing Processes and Artistic Agency
P. 134

Musicological perspectives on composing  123

            5)  supplying the model with the “right parameters”– trying out many
                different variants within a formal part;
            6)  transposing for the respective instrument (which can be electronic).
            7)  Diastematic settings always emerge during the composing process and are
                usually derived from sound ideas.
            8)  A final work is created in an “asymptotic process of convergence”
                between the computer-calculated structural variants and the composer’s
                proper experience and power of imagination as well as the interleaving of
                local and global processes.

            Obviously, the similarity of the two models cannot hide the fact that sig-
            nificant differences may yet appear on the convoluted paths of the composing
            process. Moreover, Essl has an incomparably greater repertoire of electronic
            resources at his disposal, whose relevance for the way the work’s genesis
            unfolds must also be taken into consideration (see below).
              Some contemporary composers also appear to be inspired by the idea of
            artistic research, which has been much discussed recently. To name just one
            example, the composer Marco Stroppa (2012) grapples not only with his
            artistic activity in the strict sense, but also with cognitive psychology, IT and
            artificial intelligence to enable himself to delve into the practice of composing as
            comprehensively as possible.


            4.1.4 Recent scholarly observations on the process of composing as a whole
            Since the millennium, an increasing number of studies on the entire composing
            process have been published that are not – or not exclusively – interested in
            interpreting the final product. In the Anglo-American world, there are several
            earlier analyses as well. Many of these, however, had a paedagogical motive
            and aimed to create “measurable” prerequisites for specific tasks (e.g. inventing
            a melody), which puts them in the category of laboratory studies (Collins
            2005: 196–199; Collins & Dunn 2011: 47–76).
              The more extensive studies focusing on artworks (e.g. Collins 2005; Donin
            2009; Donin & Féron 2012) tackle their task energetically. They employ not
            only all available written documents (notes, sketches, drafts and the score) but
            also sound files, the composers’ work protocols, interviews and, in some cases,
            video recordings as well. By integrating theories of creativity and different
            approaches to psychological research, they mainly develop a comprehensive
            theoretical framework that is intended to serve as the basis for interpreting
            the often substantial wealth of material. Analyses of this kind have been
            favoured recently, not least because a growing number of composers have
            themselves been interested in this research, as previously mentioned. For
            instance, when Stephen McAdams (2004) explored the genesis of the piece
            “The Angel of Death” by the American composer Roger Reynolds, his work
            was not only supported by the artist’s very methodical and easy-to-document
            way of working. Right from the start, Reynolds had also kept all documents
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139