Page 23 - eProceeding for IRSTC2017 and RESPeX2017

Jacey Mariadass / JOJAPS – JOURNAL ONLINE JARINGAN COT POLIPD
…cont

Figure 5e: Percentage for Item 5 Figure 5f: Percentage for Item 8

Figure 5g: Percentage for Item 10

Figure 5 Graphical representation of the analysis results for item 1-5, 8 and 10

Table 5 Rate of Satisfaction for SecUrAccess Software
# Item 6 Number of Respondent / Percentage (%)
1 2 3 4
i) Design 0 0 12 8
(0%) (0%) (60%) (40%)
ii) Quality 1 0 8 11
(5%) (0%) (40%) (55%)
iii) Performance 1 0 9 10
(5%) (0%) (45%) (50%)
iv) User Friendly 1 0 9 10
(5%) (0%) (45%) (50%)

The highest rate of satisfaction is the total of Satisfied and Strongly Satisfied was given for the design (100%) followed by
quality, performance and user-friendly (95%) as shown in Table 5. Overall, the results obtained in the testing of the SecUrAccess
are satisfactory and the system meets the requirements of the user. Figure 6 shows these results in a graphical format.

21 | V O L 7 - I R S T C 2 0 1 7 & R E S P E X 2 0 1 7