Page 23 - AAPT March 2019

Feature Story
System designers must consider the impact that automation can have on the of Learmonth, WA, 7 October 2008 (pp. 191-214).
effect a highly automated system can human component and by extension, Canberra: Australian Transport Safety Bureau.
have on the supervisor and adapt to human performance, has existed for Boeing. (2013) Statistical summary of commercial jet
airplane accidents. worldwide operations 1959 -2013.
mitigate those effects from the earliest many decades of high-level automation https://www.skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/2990.pdf
design phase. aviation. Casner, S.M., Geven, R.W., Recker, M. P. & Schooler
Creating a system that is adaptive In 1977 Edwards wrote a journal J.W. (2014). The retention of manual flying skills in the
and actively engages the pilot in periods article stating the lack of human factor automated cockpit. Human Factors, 56 (8), 1506-1516.
doi:10.1177/0018720814535628
of low mental workload but is also able to consideration in system design; in 1991 Chialastri, A. (2012). Automation in aviation (pp. 80-
intuitively take up tasks in times of high NASA released Human-centered aircraft 101). Rome: INTECH Open Access Publisher.
mental workload will likely be the way automation: A concept and guidelines De Boer, R., & Hurts, K. (2017). Automation Surprise.
forward. However, adaptive automation to direct their organisation, and even Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors, 7(1),
28-41. doi:10.1027/2192-0923/a000113
itself is not a simple matter and a myriad in 2018 books are being written on Dehais, F., Peysakhovich, V., Scannella, S., Fongue,
of elements must be considered in order the same subject. As exemplified J., & Gateau, T. (2015). “Automation Surprise” in
not to create its own human factors by this the human-factors approach Aviation: Real- Time Solutions. Proceedings Of
The 33Rd Annual ACM Conference On Human
problems (Endsley, 1996). The exact to automation is one that has been Factors In Computing ystems - CHI‘15. doi:
method for implementation of adaptive discussed throughout the entire history 10.1145/2702123.2702521
automation requires significant study of its use. Edwards, E. (1977). Automation in civil transport
and automated system designers It is clear from the analysis of the aircraft. Applied Ergonomics, 8(4), 194-198. doi:
10.1016/0003- 6870(77)90163-6
should make it a critical point for further sources that system designers are Endsley, M. (1996). Automation and situation
research. aware of the need to appreciate the awareness in R. Parasuraman and M. Mouloua (Eds)
Other points of improvement are human dimensions of their work, Automation and human performance: Theory and
easier to approach. This could include although translating this knowledge applications (pp163-181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum
creating a system to encourage the pilot into tangible results has thus far been Endsley, M. R., & Kiris, E. O. (1995). The out-of-
to behave in an active manner when of modest success. theloop performance problem and level of control in
monitoring, as shown by Casner et al. Inarguably, automation has had a automation. Human Factors, 37(2), (pp. 381-394).
doi:10.1518/001872095779064555
(2014), this will likely benefit cognitive significant impact on the reduction of Harris, Don. (2011). Human Performance on the Flight
skill retention. Furthermore, the drop aviation safety incidents and will likely Deck (1st ed., pp. 227-229). Farnham: Ashgate.
in situation awareness brought on by continue this trend far into the future. ICAO. (1998). Human Factors Training Manual (1st
changes in feedback to the operator However, we can see that the ed.). Montreal: ICAO.
is easily combatable through a robust application of human factors to the James, M., Birch, C., McClumpha, A. and beylavin, A.
user interface designed to provide improvement of human-automation co- (1993). The Perception of workload on the Automated
Flights Deck Farnborough: Defence Research Agency.
feedback that is informative and easily ordination may succeed in finally closing Kaber, D., & Endsley, M. (2004). The effects of level
digestible by the pilot. It should provide the gap in automation safety. of automation and adaptive automation on human
the information in such a way as to not Only if we consider the human factor performance, situation awareness and workload
in a dynamic control task. Theoretical Issues In
drastically increase the mental workload and take a human-centered approach Ergonomics Science, 5(2), 113-153.
on the pilot and thereby reduce his to system design, can we achieve http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1463922021000054335
performance. the greatest success in its application Oster, Clinton V., Strong, John S. and Zorn, Kurt. (2010).
What this means is that in a and attain zero accidents per million Why Airplanes Crash: Causes of Accidents Worldwide.
highly automated system, the user is takeoffs. In conclusion, it is considering, No 207282, 51st Annual Transportation Research
Forum. Arlington, Virginia. https://EconPapers.repec.
essentially left too little to do in the analysing and perfecting the human org/ RePEc:ags:ndtr10:207282.
system process and falls out of the dimensions of the flight deck that is key Reason, J. (2000). Safety paradoxes and safety
loop. This out-of-the-loop performance to successful automation. culture. Injury Control And Safety Promotion, 7(1),
3-14. doi: 10.1076/1566-0974(200003)7:1;1-v;ft003
issue is suggested to occur through Weiner, E. (1989). Human factors of advanced
vigilance and complacency problems, ABOUT THE AUTHOR technology (glass cockpit) transport aircraft (pp. 169-
shifting from active to passive roles in MIDN Ryan Lake is an undergraduate 182). Miami: NASA, United States. Retrieved from
the system and changes in feedback to studying a Bachelor of Science majoring in https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.
gov/19890016609.pdf
the operator (Endsley, 1996). Aviation and Chemistry at the University of Williams, K. (2004). A Summary of Unmanned Aircraft
New South Wales Canberra. He is keenly Accident/Incident Data: Human Factors Implications.
Conclusion interested in modern aviation safety and the Oklahoma City: Civil Aerospace Medical Institute.
human factors discipline. Most notably in Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/
It must be noted that little or no optimising the human performance effects a460102.pdf
systematic attempt has been made of advancing aviation technologies. Xie, B., & Salvendy, G. (2000). Review and reappraisal
to design and implement automatic References of modelling and predicting mental workload in single-
and multi-task environments. Work & Stress, 14(1),
systems in relation to the needs, Australian Transport Safety Bureau. (1996). Human 74-99. doi: 10.1080/026783700417249
capabilities and limitations of human Factors in Fatal Aircraft Accidents. Canberra: ATSB. Courtesy DFSB and Aviation Safety Spotlight
performance (Edwards, 1977). As Retrieved from https://www.atsb.gov.au/media/28363/
sir199604_001.pdf
illustrated by Edwards, concern for Australian Transport Safety Bureau. (2008). In-flight
mitigating the inadvertently negative upset — Airbus A330-303, VH-QPA, 154 km west

23