Page 41 - วารสารกฎหมาย ศาลอุทธรณ์คดีชํานัญพิเศษ
P. 41

ฉบับพิเศษ ประจำ�ปี 2564



            goods into the national market.  The table below highlights again the current national
                                          117
            policies on IP exhaustion by ASEAN Members:



               Country    Trademark Exhaustion     Patent Exhaustion    Copyright Exhaustion
               Brunei           Not Defined             Not Defined            Not Defined

              Cambodia           National             International            National
              Indonesia         Not Defined           National (except        Not Defined
                                                     pharmaceutical)

              Lao PDR            National              Not Defined              National
              Malaysia          International         International            National

              Myanmar           International      No Applicable Law        Likely National
             Philippines        International        National (except          National

                                                     pharmaceutical)
              Singapore         International      International (except     International

                                                     pharmaceutical)
              Thailand          International          Not Defined            Not Defined
               Vietnam          International         International            National



                    Certainly several (and possibly very legitimate) reasons for these national
            divergences may exist which could be based on the current status of development and

            the domestic trade policies of individual ASEAN Members, including free trade
            agreement with non-ASEAN countries. As mentioned in Part II, IP exhaustion regulation
            remains a delicate topic across many sovereign states, since regulating the enforcement

            of national IP rights may have very relevant national trade policy implications.  Thus,
                                                                                       118
            it is common for members of free trade agreements and free trade areas to ignore this
            issue unless the intention is to promote free movement of goods within the free trade



                    117  See Irene Calboli & Mary LaFrance, The Case for a Legislative Amendment Against “Accessory
            Copyright” for Gray Market Products: What Can the U.S. Learn from Singapore and Australia?, 2013 Sing. J. Legal
            Stud. 253 (2013); Irene Calboli, Corporate Strategies, First Sale Rule, and Copyright Misuse: Waiting for Answers
            from Kirtsaeng v. Wiley and Omega v. Costco (II), 11 Nw.  J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 221 (2013).
                    118  See supra Part II.



                                                                                              39
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46