Page 132 - Case Book 2017 - 2020
P. 132
'HFLVLRQ
,Q FDVHV RI WKLV NLQG WKH WZR SURWHVWV VKRXOG EH KHDUG WRJHWKHU LQ WKH
SUHVHQFH RI UHSUHVHQWDWLYHV RI DOO WKH ERDWV LQYROYHG 7KLV HQVXUHV WKDW DOO
RI WKHP KHDU DOO RI WKH WHVWLPRQ\ JLYHQ WR WKH SURWHVW FRPPLWWHH DERXW WKH
LQFLGHQW DV UHTXLUHG E\ UXOH +DG WKLV SURFHGXUH EHHQ IROORZHG WKH
SURWHVW FRPPLWWHH ZRXOG KDYH OHDUQHG WKDW WKH FROOLVLRQ EHWZHHQ 3: DQG 6
DURVH IURP WKH LQDELOLW\ RI 3: WR EHDU DZD\ EHFDXVH 3/ GLG QRW JLYH KHU
URRP WR GR VR DQG XQGHU HLWKHU UXOH D RU UXOH D 3: ZRXOG KDYH
EHHQ H[RQHUDWHG IRU EUHDNLQJ UXOH
3:¶V DSSHDO LV XSKHOG DQG VKH LV WR EH H[RQHUDWHG IRU EUHDNLQJ UXOH
DQG UHLQVWDWHG 7KH SURWHVW FRPPLWWHH¶V GHFLVLRQ WR GLVTXDOLI\ 3/ IRU
EUHDNLQJ UXOH E ZDV FRUUHFW
*%5
&$6(
'HILQLWLRQV .HHS &OHDU
5XOH 2Q 2SSRVLWH 7DFNV
5XOH $YRLGLQJ &RQWDFW
When a protest committee finds that in a port-starboard
incident S did not change course and that there was not a
genuine and reasonable apprehension of collision on the
