Page 85 - Judge Manual 2017
P. 85

When  witnesses  are  called  to  give  evidence,  a  member  of  the  protest
                       committee or the protest committee secretary should retrieve the witness. This
                       eliminates any coaching of the witnesses after the hearing starts.

                       Appendix M of the Racing Rules gives the normal routine order of conducting
                       a case, calling witnesses, etc. Appendix M is advisory and, as the preamble
                       states, the recommended procedures may be changed if needed.



               K.11  The Influence of Race Memory on Recall of Evidence

                       Human perception begins with expectation based on prior knowledge, and not
                       on  sensations  of  what  was  there  to  see  or  hear.  Persons  with  good  race
                       memory know where to look at the time of the incident and are able to recall
                       incidents with good detail, including nearby boats, positions and relative speeds
                       of boats, and the sequence of events. With good rules knowledge also, the
                       witness will present evidence that is likely to fit within the requirements of the
                       rule  believed  to  apply.  Persons  who  do  not  know  the  rules  well,  may  miss
                       important details on boat positioning that are needed to find facts.

               K.12  Cautions in Evaluating Evidence
                       Protest  committees  can  make  judgements  about  the  credibility  of  evidence
                       based  on  style  and  presentation  of  evidence.  Witnesses  who  express  their
                       opinions confidently are often given more weight than someone who is less
                       forceful and less believable. The PC should support the parties in making as
                       specific and informative statements as possible.

                       You should be aware of speech patterns that could lead juries to erroneous
                       conclusions:
                       •  Use of hedge words, such as “kind of”, “I think”, “If I’m not mistaken”, “it
                          seems”;
                          use  of  rising  intonation  in  a  declarative  statement,  suggesting  that  the
                          speaker is seeking approval for the answer, e.g. in response to the question
                          of “how fast”, the response “5 knots?”;
                       •  Repetition indicating insecurity;

                       •  Intensifiers, such as “very close”, instead of “close”;

                       •  High degree of direct quotation, indicating deference to authority; and
                       •  Use of empty adjectives, such as “charming”, “cute”, “interesting”.
                       Do  not  confuse  confident  witnesses  with  accurate  ones  because  their
                       confidence  is  based  on  more  information  than  simply  the  information  that
                       determines  its  accuracy.  Their  confidence  may  not  be  at  all  related  to  the
                       accuracy of their recall.
               K.13  Hearsay Evidence

                       The term “hearsay evidence” is a technical legal term brought over from legal
                       proceedings. It means evidence which is given by a person who has no direct
                       knowledge; he has simply heard or received it from another party. For example,
                       in support of his claim that there was a collision, a party to the protest might say
                       "John Smith, bow # 32, told me that he saw the collision."
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90