Page 418 - JoFA_2022
P. 418

suspects Joshua is a negligent supervisor or that he   and periodic confirmations are possible, other
          is inattentive and/or overly trusting of his employ-  companies receive hundreds of invoices a week. If
          ees. Some negligent supervisors are known to sign   Marcella were to check on each one, she would slow
          everything while never examining to see what they   down her processing and that of the vendor com-
          are approving. Other negligent supervisors may lack   pany. Other controls can be implemented instead.
          the technical knowledge that their employees have   If Marcella waits until the invoices are past
          and are unable to spot fraud when it happens.  due to receive payment request notices to ensure
            In general, Joshua can trust his employees, but   their authenticity, she is putting the company in a
          he must still verify that paperwork is accurate and   disadvantaged position. Not only will the company
          that the audit trail is clear. By simply paying every   forgo any discount for paying on or before time,
          request that is submitted right away, he can fall   but its reputation would likely be tarnished by the
          victim to employee and vendor fraud schemes.  slow payment.
            And while Joshua can check the vendor file
          against the invoices he receives, doing so does not   5. (d) TJ charged for a consulting service. Most
          immediately confirm that obligation belongs to the   shell company schemes involve the purchase of
          organization. Mickey can submit a credit card bill   services rather than goods because services are
          from the same company that the executives use for   intangible and nothing is required to be delivered.
          their expense credit cards, for example. Therefore,   In contrast to physical goods, which can be
          to truly protect against this type of invoice scheme,   reconciled, it is harder for an organization to verify
          Joshua must confirm that both the charges and the   whether services were actually rendered. Thus, bill-
          account belong to his company.            ing for fictitious services increases the probability
                                                    of the invoice being overlooked and the payment
          4. (a) Marcella checks whether the invoice number   being issued. Of the options provided, this would
          has been submitted from the vendor before. To   most likely be the first red flag for auditors
          prevent being victimized by a duplicate invoice   because they will not yet know about TJ’s relation-
          scheme, Marcella should look for duplicate invoice   ships and connections. They should recognize the
          numbers from each vendor to ensure an invoice,   risk that not every invoice received is authentic
          if resubmitted, is not a new charge. She should   and that services provided should be verified.
          also look for duplicate project information, such   TJ’s other methods for obscuring his involve-
          as dates, location, project numbers, and names. By   ment with the fake invoice are not as noticeable
          verifying all the information is unique, Marcella can   at first inspection. However, fraudsters often do
          confirm each invoice is genuine.          use names, locations, and businesses connected
            Looking at the invoice date will not help   to family members or friends to hide their direct
          Marcella with verifying her invoice, as the vendor   connection to a scheme. With research and records,
          could submit multiple invoices in one day for dif-  one can uncover relationships between names and
          ferent projects. While some vendors may prefer to   people; consequently, if an invoice draws suspicion,
          have one invoice for everything, others may bill by   scrutinizing names is a good place to start.
          location, project, or some other factor.
            It is not appropriate or time-efficient for any   SCORING KEY
          party if Marcella calls the vendor for verification   0–2 correct: If you answered fewer than three
          after receiving every invoice. While some com-  questions correctly, you may want to increase your
          panies might only receive a few invoices a month   knowledge of invoice fraud and red flag indicators.
                                                    Keep learning about potential scams to ensure you
                                                    are able to protect yourself, your clients, and others
             AICPA RESOURCES                        from the harms these schemes can cause.
                                                      3–4 correct: If you answered three or four ques-
             Articles                               tions correctly, you’re on the right track. Continue
             “What’s Your Fraud IQ?,” JofA, May 2022  to build your knowledge about how to look for
                                                    potential investment fraud and scams.
             “What’s Your Fraud IQ?,” JofA, March 2022
                                                      5 correct: If you answered all five questions
             “Fighting Fraud on a Limited Budget,” JofA,   correctly, congratulations. Your thorough knowledge
             March 2021
                                                    will go a long way in protecting your clients’ financial
                                                    assets from invoice scams. Keep up the good work. ■

          journalofaccountancy.com                                                              October 2022    |   15
   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423