Page 496 - JoFA_2022
P. 496

■    The nature of the client’s question or request;  A BETTER ENDING
          ■    The CPA’s response;                  A CPA was asked to calculate the tax implica-
          ■    Additional fees; and                 tions of a hypothetical sale of a family business.
          ■    A statement that the CPA’s terms and   The client was billed one hour for a preliminary,
            conditions included in the original engage-  “back-of-the envelope” calculation, which was
            ment letter between the parties apply to the   sent via email to the client along with a note
            additional services.                    explaining that this was a preliminary calculation
             If the CPA’s response is based on limited in-  only based on a hypothetical sale, that the client
          formation or summarizes preliminary thoughts,   should not take action based on this information,
          in addition to the above, the alternative docu-  and that the terms and conditions of the CPA’s
          mentation should state the following:     tax preparation engagement letter applied.
          ■    The thoughts and advice provided by the   Despite the CPA’s warning, the client sold the
            CPA are based on limited information and   business without confirming the tax implications
            are preliminary in nature;              with the CPA. Unfortunately, the client did not
          ■    Changes in circumstances or additional   tell the CPA a material fact, and the client paid
            information may change the CPA’s prelimi-  over $2 million more in tax than anticipated.
            nary advice; and                          The client asserted that, had it known the
          ■    The client should not act or make decisions   actual amount of tax due from the sale, it would
            based upon the CPA’s advice without a more   not have sold the business, and, as a result, the
            complete analysis.                      CPA should pay the additional tax, not the client.
                                                    Additionally, the client’s damages claim included
          What not to do                            missed investment gains from the lost opportu-
          Providing advice or responses to client questions   nity to invest the money paid in taxes.
          via text and other informal communication   Fortunately, the CPA’s email proved instru-
          methods is not recommended, as the brief,   mental in defending the case. The firm argued
          generally informal nature of these communica-  that the client requested a preliminary calculation,
          tion methods is not conducive to including   and the CPA clearly stated the client should not
          the critical documentation requirements   rely on the calculation before proceeding with an
          described above.                          actual sale. Further, the firm’s terms and condi-
                                                    tions limited its liability to three times fees and
          COMMUNICATION AND TRAINING                excluded indirect damages such as missed invest-
          Use of alternative documentation is an area   ment opportunities. Based on these defenses, the
          ripe for inconsistent application across the firm.   claim was dismissed.
          To ensure all firm owners and employees help
          manage the firm’s risk, communicate the firm’s   Deborah K. Rood, CPA, is a risk control consulting
          documentation protocol, including when and   director at CNA. For more information about this
          how to use it, and provide routine training on it.   article, contact specialtyriskcontrol@cna.com.   ■
            Consider beginning all staff meetings with
          a story about when scope expanded and how   Continental Casualty Company, one of the CNA insurance companies, is
                                                    the underwriter of the AICPA Professional Liability Insurance Program.
          it was documented. This understanding is
                                                    Aon Insurance Services, the National Program Administrator for the
          every professional’s responsibility, not just the   AICPA Professional Liability Program, is available at 800-221-3023 or
          partners’. Give accolades to the individual who   visit cpai.com.
                                                      This article provides information, rather than advice or opinion. It
          identified the scope expansion, especially if it
                                                    is accurate to the best of the author’s knowledge as of the article date. This
          is a junior professional. Alternatively, a weekly   article should not be viewed as a substitute for recommendations of a
          communication to the firm could highlight   retained professional. Such consultation is recommended in applying this
                                                    material in any particular factual situations.
          these success stories.
                                                      Examples are for illustrative purposes only and not intended to estab-
            When conducting technical training, con-  lish any standards of care, serve as legal advice, or acknowledge any given
          sider adding a section on how to document ad-  factual situation is covered under any CNA insurance policy. The relevant
                                                    insurance policy provides actual terms, coverages, amounts, conditions, and
          ditional services. For example, an email may be
                                                    exclusions for an insured. All products and services may not be available in
          sufficient to document an initial discussion with   all states and may be subject to change without notice.
          a client regarding a new tax law, but if the client
          requests research as to how it will apply to their
          specific facts, will the firm require a new engage-
          ment letter? An engagement letter addendum?

          journalofaccountancy.com                                                             December 2022    |   5
   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501