Page 101 - ACFE Fraud Reports 2009_2020
P. 101

Table of Contents



                                          Education of the Perpetrator – Median Loss






                                                                                $325,000
                          Postgraduate Degree
                        Education Level  Bachelor Degree      $150,000  $243,000              2004
                                                              $162,500

                                                                                              2002


                           High School or Less    $50,000
                                                     $70,000


                                           $0              $100,000        $200,000       $300,000        $400,000
                                                              Median Loss



                       The Effect of Collusion

                       Approximately two-thirds of the frauds in our study were committed by a single perpetrator,
                       but when more than one person conspired to commit fraud, the median loss rose
                       dramatically, more than tripling. This trend was expected because when multiple
                       perpetrators conspire to commit a fraud, this makes it easier to circumvent anti-fraud
                       controls. For example, collusion among several employees can render ineffective the
                       independent checks that might otherwise flag an internal fraud scheme. The effect of
                       collusion was actually much larger in our 2002 study, where we found that the median
                       loss increased by a multiple of 7 when more than one person conspired to defraud an
                       organization.


                                             Number of Perpetrators – Frequency



                         Number of Perpetrators  Two or more  32.4%            65.1%          2004
                                    One
                                                                                 67.6%


                                                                                              2002
                                                              34.9%




                                        0%                 20%                 40%                60%                80%


                                                         Percent of Cases










                                                                                                                 35
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106