Page 62 - ACFE Fraud Reports 2009_2020
P. 62

Table of Contents






                    2004 Report to the Nation on Occupational Fraud and Abuse


                        Letter from the President and CEO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .i
                        About the ACFE  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ii
                        Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .iii

                    1. INTRODUCTION  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
                        What is Occupational Fraud?
                    2. METHODOLOGY  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
                        Who Provided the Data?
                        Where Did the Frauds Occur?
                        Types of Organizations
                    3. MEASURING THE COST OF OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
                        Distribution of Dollar Losses
                        Uniform Occupational Fraud Classification System  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10
                    4. HOW OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD IS COMMITTED  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11
                        Asset Misappropriations – Cash vs. Non-Cash
                        Cash Misappropriations
                        Fraudulent Disbursements
                        Comparison of All Fraud Categories – 2002 and 2004
                        Methods of Fraud Based on Industry
                        Methods of Fraud Based on Organization Type of the Victim
                        Methods of Fraud in Small Businesses
                    5. DETECTING OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
                        Detecting Fraud by Owners and Executives
                        Detecting the Largest Frauds
                        Detecting Fraud in Small Businesses
                        Detection Based on the Type of Victim Organization
                    6. LIMITING FRAUD LOSSES  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26
                        Anonymous Fraud Hotlines
                        Internal Audits
                        External Audits
                    7.  THE PERPETRATORS  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30
                        The Effect of the Perpetrator’s Position
                        The Perpetrator’s Annual Income
                        The Effect of Tenure
                        The Effect of Gender
                        The Effect of Age
                        The Effect of Education
                        The Effect of Collusion
                        The Perpetrators’ Criminal Histories
                    8. CASE RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37
                        Employment Actions Taken Against Fraudsters
                        Criminal Prosecutions
                        Civil Lawsuits
                        Why do Organizations Decline to Take Legal Action?
                        Recovering Losses Caused by Fraud
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67