Page 162 - HandbookMarch1
P. 162

7
                                     Dorota Babilas
          __________________________________________________________________
            The  hidden  signatures  –  in  the  Rotonde  des  Abonnés,  in  the  gilded  Avant
          Foyer – the initials concealed on the grandest plafond of the splendid Grand Foyer,
          the portraits tucked into the corner of Paul Baudry’s allegorical Parnassus – all
          this, plus the ubiquitous motive of the mask, seems to suggest a complex puzzle
          designed by the architect as the Opera’s host and master of the ceremonies. His
          gilded bust casts a discrete supervisory glance upon the crowd promenading the
          Grand Foyer. Garnier appears here in the guise of Mercury – the guide of souls, the
          protector of tradesmen and thieves, the intermediary between the world above and
          Hades, the god of jokes and traps. Opposite him, across the hall, stands a similar
          bust of his wife Louise disguised as Amphitrite, the faithful wife of Poseidon. Is
          this Garnier’s answer to the world’s grumbling that an ugly man is unworthy of
          love?
            The Garniers were both ardent admirers of the operatic art; they bought yearly
          subscriptions for the use of a box, a modest one numbered 5 on the ground floor.
          This is not the famous Box Five which in the novel was to be left unsold for the
          exclusive  use  of  the  Phantom.  The  Grand  Tier  boxes,  notwithstanding  the  one
          situated  right  next  to  the  Emperor’s  private  box,  were  far  beyond  the  financial
          reach of even a successful architect. Still, I think, the number used in the novel
          is  not  coincidental.  Just  as  in  Notre-Dame  de  Paris  the  printed  Bible  was  to
          replace  ‘the  Bible  in  stone’,  that  is  the  Gothic  cathedral,  the  novel  of  Gaston
          Leroux aspires to become the literary monument and homage to the Palace Garnier
          and its maker.
            So,  Erik  the  Phantom  remains  a  palimpsest,  a  compilation  –  an  architect,
          musician, illusionist and circus freak whose fictional biography mirrors many real
          lives  of  his  contemporaries.  Fate  did  not  provide  him  with  an  author  of  Victor
          Hugo’s  class  who  would  have  made  him  akin  to  Quasimodo  or  Gwynplaine  or,
          perhaps,  would  have  reached  even  deeper,  to  the cruel  and  tragic  anti-heroes  of
          Shakespeare and the Gothic novel; a writer who might have given him the soul
          and flair worthy of grand opera. Still, the power of the tale dismissed as a penny-
          dreadful does not seem to diminish in time. Quite on the contrary – the characters
          created by Leroux have become the mainstay of modern popular culture. The sheer
          amount of adaptations of The Phantom of the Opera in all possible media is hard to
          overlook, and although not all of them use the Palais Garnier as their background,
          the Paris Opera’s fame lives on.

                                        Notes
   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167