Page 20 - Fighting Against the Injustice of the State and Globalization
P. 20

•
                                                                                                     Introduction
                                                                                                                     11
                                                   long-term social changes. As the French Revolution shaped the nature of the nation-
                                                   state and as the emergence of various national movements spawned many nation-states,
                                                   the failure of various nation-states to transform themselves into multicultural democra-
                                                   tic states has facilitated the emergence of oppressed nationalism in the modern world
                                                         62
                                                   system. Nationalism can be divided into oppressor and oppressed nationalism.While
                                                   oppressor nationalism maintains racial/ethnonational hierarchy, oppressed nationalism
                                                   seeks self-determination for dominated ethnonational groups. Oppressed nationalism is
                                                   a form of opposition politics that serves as an ideology of resistance against a racialized
                                                                                                  63
                                                   or an ethnicized state within either a country or an empire.
                                                      The present work has set out to demonstrate that the processes of colonialism and
                                                   racialization/ethnicization of the global division of labor have denied or limited the
                                                   access of African Americans and Oromos to cultural, political, and economic resources
                                                   within the US and Ethiopian states. Exploring the features of racial/ethnonational and
                                                   gender stratification,Wallerstein has observed that “capitalism developed an ideologi-
                                                   cal framework of oppressive humiliation which had never previously existed, and
                                                                             64
                                                   which today we call . . . racism.” The European colonial powers and their collabo-
                                                   rators created stratified multiracial or multiethnic societies in which they practiced
                                                   racial dictatorship, known as “Herrenvolk” democracies, in countries such as the
                                                   United States, South Africa, Brazil, and Australia. Gloria Marshall argues that “scien-
                                                   tific and lay concepts of race have served to support the economic and political priv-
                                                   ileges of ruling groups who regard themselves as superior by virtue of phylogenetic
                                                                                                     65
                                                   heritage rather than because of the accidents of cultural history.” Some academic and
                                                   other elites invented and theorized the issues of race and ethnicity presenting them as
                                                                   66
                                                   natural phenomena. As a result, race was seen as a biological phenomenon that de-
                                                   termined a hierarchy that could not be changed. 67
                                                      This discourse was promoted as “scientific,” although it ignored historical facts.
                                                   Rather than explaining the problem of discrepancies among “races”as a problem of the
                                                   last five hundred years associated with global capitalism, some Euro-American scholars
                                                   and their collaborators in peripheral areas of the world have attempted to present this
                                                   problem as a naturally given social process. Noting that several precapitalist empires,
                                                   such as the Egyptian, Roman, and Muslim empires, brought together various peoples
                                                   who had different cultures and physical characteristics without developing the ideol-
                                                               68
                                                   ogy of racism, Winant comments, “The five-hundred years of domination of the
                                                   globe by Europe and its inheritors is the historical context in which racial concepts of
                                                   difference have attained their present status as fundamental components of human
                                                   identity and inequality.” 69  Pseudoscientific discourses were produced, for instance, in
                                                   American and Ethiopian studies, which promoted and maintained the privileges of
                                                   Euro-Americans and their collaborators. Such studies used themes such as civilization,
                                                   progress, and cultural universalism to justify racial/ethnonational stratification and thus
                                                   negate the history, culture, and humanity of the colonized peoples of the world.The
                                                   African American and Oromo peoples provide case studies in this latter category.
                                                      Negative views of subjugated people prevented knowledge elites within the colo-
                                                   nial system from perceiving the needs, aspirations, and humanity of those people.
                                                   Some social scientists took it upon themselves to promote the interests of the colo-
                                                   nizing “races” or ethnonational groups at the cost of the colonized peoples.Thomas
                                                   W. Heaney remarks that “with the writing of history, knowledge became power, or
                                                   rather an expression of power and a tool for maintaining it. History, and later, science,
                                                   were frequently used not merely to understand, but to legitimize historically shaped
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25