Page 51 - SAFFER 07
P. 51

Inge



                                                              that this was ‘their way of playing’ and I should stop thinking
                                                              about interfering or involving the captain. I didn’t as to me it
                                                              wasn’t cricket and it shouldn’t happen. I ended up talking to the
                                                              captain and that was only seen as a red flag, as they had clearly
                                                              seen that I would get no support in this from my colleague, and
                                                              their ‘go to’ comment after that was something on the lines of
                                                              not being allowed to play their cricket, implying discrimination
                                                              or prejudice. A year after the match, the home captain talked
                                                              to me about that match and told me ‘I had been hung out to
                                                              dry’ by my colleague, who at the time was umpiring at Minor
                                                              County level. So having the ability and experience to recognise
                                                              a situation for what it is, doesn’t always mean treating it as such
                                                              is the way to go: in cricket, as in hockey, you need some sort of
                                                              balance and consistency between the on field umpires to deal
        not only by the match manager but also by the manager of the   with players who decide to flaunt the rules of the game. Espe-
        home team. My advice was taken to heart, Jack got substituted   cially when you are considered the junior umpire.
        and talked to and came back to have one of his best perfor-
        mances I’d seen so far. Even if ‘my’ team lost. Yes, I completely   Being the senior umpire but not being recognised as such, is
        agree that this approach is tricky, but when you get feedback   something else though! We end on a more humorous note,
        from the opposition and the match manager that this was actu-  therefor. A ‘century ago’, the Dutch umpiring committee had
        ally quite a good way of handling this situation, plus I get a clear   decided that umpires who were identified as promotable, would
        ‘thank you’ from the captain and the team manager, I know that   umpire with an experienced colleague from the higher league
        I’ve managed to ‘pitch’ my umpiring at the right level and done   three times; once in the lower league, in order for the two to get
        a good job. I also know that 30 years ago, when I was umpiring   used to each other - style of umpiring, communication, etc – at
        the top hockey leagues in Netherlands, I might have been tech-  the level the ‘new guy’ was used to umpiring, and the first two
        nically able to do this but certainly didn’t have the experience   matches of the ‘new guy’ at the higher level. Or something sim-
        and trust from players and managers to get away with things   ilar. One of the umpires used for this purpose is a guy who is
        like that.                                            regarded as one of the best international hockey umpires of that
                                                              era. Let’s call him Bill. After the first match, the two umpires do
        Gaining the confidence to think outside the box and play with   the normal debrief with the two captains. On the matter of Bill’s
        the wording of regulations rather than umpire to the letter of   performance, he gets the clear advice that ‘some more work is
        them, however, is something that is also something of a riddle.   required, but he’ll get there at this level’. Whereupon Bill comes
        Sometimes using that higher standard knowledge of the game   back with ‘great, thanks for that, I’ll try that next week when
        to assess situations and help play move on in lower competition,   I’m umpiring the Champions Trophy in India’. I only heard this
        or address players in order to tell them that you have seen them   story, but it did really happen, and I can assure you, I would
        flouting regulations but you don’t want to interfere yet, is not   have loved seeing the reaction of the captains!
        recognised as such or even seen as a challenge to push you. Two
        different examples. One from cricket, one from hockey. First   The main aim of the game is to learn, reflect, talk to your mates
        one me, second one not me.                            and adapt! See you next time!


        Cricket first. On a ground where the rain of the last 48 hours
        has clearly had some effect, the pitch is damp but playable. The
        away captain wins the toss and decides to bat first. I never knew
        why but that’s neither here nor there. The match is shorter than
        the official 50 overs a side (I think it was 35), and the away
        team post a disappointing total. As the pitch is drying, the team
        batting second will still have a job to do but the total to beat is
        generally perceived as too low. It was the first time I umpired
        the away team but knowing cricket, I expected that we would
        get a lot of appeals or see other behaviour intent on making
        the batsmen not reach that target. And we did. The moment a
        batsman got a bit settled, one of the youngest members of the
        fielding team, fielding at first or second slip, would move in
        front, eyeballing the batsman, or be vocal in order to try and
        intimidate or distract them. As soon as I became aware of this,
        I tried interacting with him, making him aware that I knew
        exactly what I was doing but wasn’t going to go through his
        captain. He just blanked me and merrily continued what he
        was doing. I then went to my colleague to discuss the next step
        and found that my colleague had come to the same interpreta-
        tion of what was happening. Unfortunately for me, he told me

                                                                                                             51  |
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52