Page 7 - Academy of Osseointegration (AO) Academy News Vol 36, No 1 2025

Driving excellence in implantology:
The power of feedback loops in
interdisciplinary dentistry
By: Robert J. Stanley II, DDS, PhD, MS; Academy News Guest Contributor
Interdisciplinary dentistry has revolutionized implantology by bringing together diverse professional expertise to deliver optimal patient outcomes.
This collaborative approach capitalizes on the unique strengths of each team member, ensuring comprehensive and effective care. While this method offers undeniable advantages, it also introduces complexities, particularly
in maintaining clear communication channels. These channels are critical for creating effective feedback loops, without which clinicians cannot fully realize opportunities to refine their craft and achieve better results.
The multifactorial nature of implant success
Implant success depends on the careful orchestration of multiple factors. Key indicators such as pink and white aesthetic scores measure the visual harmony of the restoration, while patient satisfaction and the longevity of the solution reflect its functional and emotional impact. Whether a provider operates independently or as part of
a team, success hinges on recognizing the interconnected variables influencing outcomes. This underscores the importance of structured reflection — examining both triumphs and shortcomings — to advance clinical excellence.
Why feedback loops are critical
A feedback loop is essential for growth and improvement. Without it, practitioners lack the critical insights needed to assess whether their outcomes — good or bad — stem from their methodologies or external variables. This lack of awareness stifles improvement and innovation. For an interdisciplinary team, this process becomes exponentially more complicated with each additional member, whether a surgeon, prosthodontist, lab technician, or any other stakeholder.
The complexity arises
because as team size
increases, so does the number
of communication pathways. This
phenomenon can be illustrated
mathematically: the number of potential subsets of interactions within a team equals 2k – k – 1, where k is the number of members (Fig. 1). For example, moving from four to five members changes the number of unique subsets from 11 to 26, dramatically increasing the opportunities for miscommunication or information loss. Consequently, the feedback loop becomes increasingly vulnerable, risking the loss of critical insights that could drive improvement.
Establishing robust feedback mechanisms
For the interdisciplinary approach to reach its full potential, feedback mechanisms must be intentional, comprehensive, and inclusive. This requires a data-driven approach, collecting and sharing objective, measurable information — photographs, videos, radiographs, three- dimensional imaging, and optical scans. These diagnostic tools provide the foundation for informed decision-making and continuous improvement.
Consider the discovery of facial recession around an implant three years post-restoration. For meaningful improvement, planners, surgeons, lab technicians, and restorative dentists must collectively evaluate such outcomes to identify contributing factors. Without this shared evaluation, there is a risk of attributing the issue to one discipline when, in reality, the outcome likely reflects a combination of factors: surgical placement, prosthetic design, patient compliance, healing protocols, and more.
The broader implication:
Advancing the industry
By fostering a culture of shared accountability and collaborative learning, the dental implant community can collectively elevate standards of care. Feedback loops transcend fault-finding; they are catalysts for innovation, driving clinicians to refine techniques, enhance outcomes, and elevate the entire field of implantology.
Ultimately, the goal is not to alienate individual providers or elevate one model over another but to underscore a universal truth: The more effectively we communicate, evaluate, and adapt, the better we become as clinicians — and the greater the benefit to our patients. By embracing interdisciplinary collaboration and fostering robust feedback systems, we can shape a future of continuous improvement, ensuring the highest standard of care for every patient.
7
Dr. Robert J. Stanley II
Fig. 1: This chart illustrates how the addition of each
new participant to a project exponentially increases the complexity of communication pathways, heightening the risk of information being miscommunicated or not reaching all parties involved.