Page 630 - Hand rearing birds second
P. 630

Insects and Other Arthropods as Food  631

               specifying the types and amounts of insects that are fed, it is not possible to accurately calculate the
             nutritional composition of the resulting diet. See Chapters 43 and 44, for more information on
             feeding supplemented all-insect diets.


             Insect-substitute­Diets
             As an alternative to insect-based diets, blends of commercially-available ingredients may be uti-
             lized to prepare insect-substitute diets. These formulas are designed with the nutrient composition
             of insects in mind, as well as ease of preparation and access to components. Over the years, several
             formulas have been published or described, and subsequently modified as new knowledge and/or
             changes in commercial ingredients occurred. Tables 41.3 and 41.4 provide the diet ingredients and
             nutrient composition of several formulas currently in use. There are many other formulas used in
             rehabilitation settings, but due to lack of complete information (and thus the inability to accurately
             estimate nutrient levels in the finished product), such formulas are not evaluated in this text.
               One incredibly important consideration with insect-substitute diets is that they are formulated
             around the inclusion of specific components. Therefore, substitution of those components (e.g.
             replacement of one cat food product with another brand) is ill-advised, as the nutrient composition
             of the finished formula will change and may no longer be suitable. As our knowledge of the com-
             position of insects evolves, more modifications to these formulae will be possible. Essential nutri-
             ents for which our knowledge is still limited, such as fatty acids, trace minerals, and vitamins, may
             be further optimized in the future, and this progress is already evident in revisions of commonly
             fed formulas (e.g. Winn 2002; Winn and Finke 2004, 2017).
               As noted in several of the insect-substitute diets, insects may be a component of a total diet. For
                            ©
             example, the BuNS  formula incorporates dried crickets, mealworms, and soldier fly larvae, plus
             calcium and vitamin supplements, with all components in specified amounts. After the combina-
             tion has been processed, water is added to the ground mixture to achieve a consistency appropriate
             for forceps-feeding (Winn and Finke 2017). A suitable feeding program for any given organization
             or individual should be available to meet economic needs, animal needs, and provider comfort level.
               There have been only a few efforts to compare diets such as these in actual practice. The chal-
             lenge in such attempts is controlling extraneous variables that could provide alternative explana-
             tions for results seeming to favor one diet or another.
                                                                    ©
                                                                               ®
               Seage et al. 2010 reported results of a feeding trial comparing FoNS  and Mazuri  Nestling Meal
             (MNM). On admission, healthy clutchmates from various species were randomly assigned to the
             two dietary treatments but were housed together. Staff caregivers were experienced in syringe-
             feeding and followed standard facility protocols for nestling birds (Figure 41.4). Gains in weight
             and feather development were similar in the two groups, with the two diets judged equivalent in
             ability to support healthy growth. Birds in the MNM group had more vivid yellow mouth color,
             likely due to the marigold extract in that diet. Fusté et al. (2013) reported a comparison of several
                                                                    ©
             hand-rearing diets, including a formula somewhat similar to FoNS  (but using a different base
             product) compared to cricket- or mealworm-based diets (with supplementation). Lower fledging
             weights were observed in the formula group relative to the insect groups, but, unfortunately, this
             project did not use split-clutch assignment to dietary treatments, and thus initial body weights and
             ages were quite variable between treatments. Additionally, several factors other than the primary
             food varied among conditions, including various unquantified vitamin and mineral supplements
             in the insect groups, and total feed intake level (and thus total energy and nutrient allocation to
             birds). Further research evaluating optimal feeding programs for a given avian species is needed
             but is very challenging to undertake in a controlled manner.
   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635