Page 244 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 244

252  Section IV: Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

           relatively soon after surgery. However, if anorexia is expected to
           persist beyond 3 days from the last meal, then supplementation
           should be considered.
            In patients that have had prolonged periods of anorexia, such as
           those with intracranial disease or when it is unknown whether normal
           neurological status will be maintained postoperatively, nutritional
           supplementation should be considered as part of the perioperative
           management. Enteral nutrition is preferred over parenteral nutrition
           as it has been shown to be superior in maintaining enterocyte health
           and promoting gastrointestinal motility. Enteral nutrition should be
           used any time the intestinal tract is functional. Another consideration
           is when to start feeding patients following surgery, particularly when
           intracranial surgery has been performed. This depends on the period
           of anorexia prior to surgery, the postoperative neurological status, and
           method of nutritional supplementation.
           Enteral Nutrition
           There are several ways of providing enteral nutrition with varying   Figure 28.5  Postoperative patient with a nasogastric tube secured in place
           degrees of invasiveness. The ability to prehend and swallow without   (right nostril). Source: Courtesy of Andrea Steele.
           risk of aspiration may be a concern in the immediate postoperative
           period in patients that have undergone intracranial surgery. The
           presence of megaesophagus or vomiting and regurgitation as well as   the tube or the tube is removed prior to a permanent adhesion
           having undergone intracranial surgery are risk factors for the devel-  forming to the abdominal wall. Complications that can be seen with
           opment of aspiration pneumonia [43].              either esophagostomy or gastrostomy tubes is infection around the
            The simplest method of providing enteral nutrition is with a   stoma. Daily inspection and stoma care should be performed, with
           nasogastric tube. Tube placement is minimally invasive and can   bandaging of the site recommended.
           be performed under sedation. A tube is passed from the nares   Whenever possible, bolus feeding (versus continuous‐rate
           into the stomach with confirmation of tube placement via a lat-  infusion feeding) should be considered for nutritional supple-
           eral thoracic radiograph to ensure that the tube is in the stomach.   mentation. If the patient is conscious and not vomiting, bolus
           An advantage of the nasogastric tube is the ability to aspirate   feeding is recommended as it is more physiological and stimu-
           stomach contents if there is delayed gastric emptying, which can   lates normal gastrointestinal motility. The maximum amount of
           otherwise lead to vomiting and regurgitation. A limitation of   food that is currently recommended to be fed to critically ill and
           nasogastric tube feeding is the type of food that can be placed   postoperative  patients  is based  on  a  patient’s  resting energy
           down the tube, with only liquid diets such as Clinicare® or   requirement (RER). It is not currently recommended to feed
           Ensure® being appropriate. This method of feeding is considered   more than RER, with increasing evidence to suggest that over‐
           temporary and if the patient is conscious the tube can cause some   feeding of patients can compound the metabolic alterations of
           irritation leading to sneezing (increasing intracranial pressure)   the stress response leading to hyperglycemia [44]. Although it is
           and pawing at the face, so caution should be exercised for crani-  unknown whether this translates to other species or to naturally
           otomy patients (Figure 28.5).                     occurring disease processes, restrictive feeding on an every other
            For provision of longer‐term nutritional supplementation or   day schedule was shown to be neuroprotective in a rat cervical
           when intracranial surgery has been performed, placement of an   spinal cord model [45].
           esophagostomy tube (E‐tube) should be considered while the   The following formula can be used to calculate RER:
           patient is under general anesthesia. This is especially important if      RER = 70 kcal × body weight in kg
                                                                                                0.75
           prolonged anorexia or delayed neurological recovery is expected.
           Esophagostomy tubes are easy and quick to insert, are associated   Depending on the period of anorexia, begin with feeding one‐third
           with few complications, and have the advantage of allowing foods   to half the RER. The amount of food to be fed can be initially
           with increased consistency, such as Hill’s a/d®, to be fed through   divided into six to eight bolus feedings over a 24‐hour period or
           them along with any oral medication. The tube is typically placed   divided over the 24‐hour period if continuous‐rate feeding is used.
           on the left side of the neck and extends down to just past the base   Prior  to  feeding  bolus  amounts,  residual  volumes  should  be
           of the heart, which is confirmed by thoracic radiography. An    checked by aspirating the feeding tube. Residual volumes that are
           E‐tube can remain in place for short or long periods of time, with   considered normal in veterinary patients have not been established,
           abscessation around the tube stoma being the most frequent com-  although 4‐hour residual volumes exceeding 50% of what was
           plication. This tube can be converted into an esophagogastric tube   administered over the preceding 4 hours (or at last feeding) is
           if desired.                                         considered excessive. For nasogastric tubes, if there are large resid-
            A gastrostomy tube could be considered to provide longer‐term   ual volumes in the stomach, this could indicate poor gastric motil-
           nutrition to patients. They can be placed either surgically via a celi-  ity  and  may  lead  to  increased  nausea  and  risk  of  vomiting  and
           otomy or percutaneously using endoscopic guidance (PEG tube).   regurgitation. If aspirating residual volumes for removal, approxi-
           Percutaneously placed gastrostomy tubes should remain in place   mately 1–2 mL/kg of the volume should be returned to prevent
           for a minimum of 10 days to allow adhesion of the stomach to the   development of metabolic alkalosis. If there are large residual
           abdominal wall and a stoma to form. A potential complication of     volumes or vomiting, addition of gastric motility agents should be
           the gastrostomy tube is septic peritonitis if there is leakage around   considered (Table 28.4).
   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249