Page 126 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 126

92   Chapter 2


            References                                         22.  Holmstrom M, Magnusson LE, Phillipsson J. Variation in confor­
                                                                  mation of Swedish Warmblood horses and conformational char­
                                                                  acteristics of elite sport horses. Equine Vet J 1990;22:186–193.
  VetBooks.ir  2.  Anderson TA, McIlwraith CW, Douay P. The role of conformation   23.  Holmstrom M, Fredricson I, Drevemo S. Biokinematic effects of
             1.  Anderson  TA, McIlwraith CW. Longitudinal developmental  of
               equine conformation from weanling to 3 years of age in the
               Thoroughbred. Equine Vet J 2004;36:571–575.
                                                                  collection on trotting gaits in the dressage horse. Equine Vet J
                                                                  1995;27:281–287.
               in musculoskeletal problems in racing Thoroughbreds. Equine Vet
               J 2004;36:571–575.                              24.  Ishihara A, Bertone AL, Rajala‐Schultz PJ. Association between
                                                                  subjective lameness grade and kinetic gait parameters in horses
             3.  Axelsson M, Bjornsdottir S, Eksell P, et al. Risk factors associated   with  experimentally  induced  forelimb  lameness.  Am  J  Vet  Res
               with hindlimb lameness and degenerative joint disease in the distal   2005;66:1805–1815.
               tarsus of Icelandic horses. Equine Vet J 2001;33:84–90.  25.  Keegan KG. Evidence‐based lameness detection and quantifica­
             4.  Back W. The role of the hoof and shoeing. In Equine Locomotion,   tion. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2007;23:403–423.
               Back  W, Clayton HM, eds.  WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 2001;   26.  Kobluk CN, Robinson A, Gordon BG, et al. The effect of confor­
               135–166.                                           mation  and  shoeing:  a  cohort  study  of  95 Thoroughbred  race­
             5.  Back W, Schamhardt HC, Hartman W, et al. Kinematic differences   horses. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 1990;36:259–274.
               between  the distal  portions of the  forelimbs  and hind limbs of   27.  Konen EPC, Velduizen AE, Brascamp EW. Genetic parameters of
               horses at the trot. Am J Vet Res 1995;56:1522–1528.  linear scored conformation traits and their relation to dressage
             6.  Back W, Schamhardt HC, Barnveld A. The influence of conforma­  and show jumping performance in the Dutch Warmblood riding
               tion on fore and hind limb kinematics of trotting Dutch   horse population. Livestock Production Sci 1995;43:85.
               Warmblood horses. Pferdeheilkunde 1996;12:647–650.  28.  Love S, Wyse CA, Stirk AJ, et al. Prevalence, heritability and signifi­
             7.  Baxter GM, Stashak TS. Examination for lameness. In Adams and   cance of musculoskeletal conformational traits in Thoroughbred
               Stashak’s Lameness in Horses, 6th ed. Baxter GM, ed.  Wiley‐  yearlings. Equine Vet J 2006;38:597–603.
               Blackwell, Ames, IA, 2011;109–150.              29.  Marks D. Conformation and soundness. Proc Am Assoc Equine
             8.  Beeman GM. The clinical diagnosis of lameness. Compend Contin   Pract 2000;46:39–45.
               Educ Pract Vet 1988;10:172–179.                 30.  Mawdsley A, Kelly EP, Smith FH, et al. Linear assessment of the
             9.  Beeman GM. Conformation of the horse: relationship of form to   Thoroughbred horse: an approach to conformation evaluation.
               function. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 2008;54:1–5.  Equine Vet J 1996;28:461–467.
            10.  Belloy E, Bathe AP. The importance of standardizing the evaluation   31.  McIlwraith CW, Anderson TA, Douay P, et al. Role of conformation
               of conformation in the horse. Equine Vet J 1996;28:429–430.  in musculoskeletal problems in the racing Thoroughbred and racing
            11.  Buchner HH, Savelberg HH, Schamhardt HC, et  al. Head and   Quarter Horse. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 2003;49:59–61.
               trunk movement adaptations in horses with experimentally   32.  Riemersma DJ, Schamhardt HC, Hartman W, et al. Kinetics and kin­
               induced fore‐ or hindlimb lameness. Equine Vet J 1996;28:71–76.  ematics of the equine hindlimb: in vivo tendon loads and force plate
            12.  Buchner HH, Savelberg HH, Schamhardt HC, et al. Limb move­  measurements in ponies. Am J Vet Res 1988; 49:1344–1352.
               ment adaptations in horses with experimentally induced fore‐ or   33.  Ross MW. Movement. In Diagnosis and Management of Lameness
               hindlimb lameness. Equine Vet J 1996;28:63–70.     in the Horse, Ross MW, Dyson SJ, eds. Elsevier, St. Louis, MO,
            13.  Dabareiner RM, Cohen ND, Carter GK, et al. Lameness and poor   2011;64–80.
               performance in horses used for team roping: 118 cases (2000–  34.  Santschi EM, Leibsle SR, Morehead JP, et al. Carpal and fetlock
               2003). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;226:1694–1699.      conformation of the juvenile Thoroughbred from birth to yearling
            14.  Dalin G, Magnuson LE, Thafvelin BC. Retrospective study of hind   auction age. Equine Vet J 2006;38;604–609.
               quarter asymmetry in standardbred trotter and its correlation   35.  Stashak TS. Examination for lameness. In Adams’ Lameness in
               with performance. Equine Vet J 1985;17:292–296.    Horses, 5th ed. Stashak TS, ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins,
            15.  Ducro BJ, Bovenhuis H, Back W. Heritability of foot conforma­  Philadelphia, 2002;113–183.
               tion and its relationship to sports performance in a Dutch   36.  Stashak  TS, Hill C. Conformation and movement. In  Adams’
               Warmblood horse population. Equine Vet J 2009;41:139–143.  Lameness in Horses, 5th ed. Stashak TS, ed. Lippincott Williams
            16.  Dyson S, Murray R. Pain associated with the sacroiliac joint region:   and Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2002;73–111.
               a clinical study of 74 horses. Equine Vet J 2003;35:240–245.  37.  Steel CM, Hopper BJ, Richardson JL, et al. Clinical findings, diag­
            17.  Dyson S, Murray R. Management of hindlimb proximal suspen­  nosis, prevalence, and predisposing factors for lameness localized
               sory desmopathy by neurectomy of the deep branch of the lateral   to the middle carpal joint in young Standardbred racehorses.
               plantar nerve and plantar fasciotomy: 155 horses (2003–2008).   Equine Vet J 2006;38:152–157.
               Equine Vet J 2012;44:361–367.                   38.  Thompson KN. Skeletal growth‐rates of weanling and yearling
            18.  Gnagey L,  Clayton HM, Lanovaz  JL. Effect  of standing  tarsal   thoroughbred horses. J Anim Sci 1995;73:2513–2517.
               angle on joint kinematics and kinetics. Equine  Vet J 2006;38:   39.  Weishaupt MA. Adaptation strategies of horses with lameness.
               628–633.                                           Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2008;24:79–100.
            19.  Gomez Alvarez CB, Bobbert MF, Lamers L, et al. The effect of   40.  Weller R, Pfau T, May SA, et al. Variation in conformation in a cohort
               induced hindlimb lameness on thoracolumbar kinematics during   of National Hunt racehorses. Equine Vet J 2006;38:616–621.
               treadmill locomotion. Equine Vet J 2008;40:147–152.  41.  Weller R, Pfau T, Verheyen K, et al. The effect of conformation on
            20.  Hill, C., Klimesh R. Horse Hoof Care. Storey Publishing. North   orthopedic health and performance in a cohort of National Hunt
               Adams, MA, 2009.                                   racehorses: preliminary results. Equine Vet J 2006;38:622–627.
            21.  Holmstrom M.  The effects of conformation. In Equine   42.  Wiggers N, Nauwelaerts SL, Hobbs SJ, et al. Functional locomo­
               Locomotion, Back W, Clayton HM eds. WB Saunders, Philadelphia,   tor consequences of uneven forefeet for trot symmetry in individ­
               2001;281–296.                                      ual riding horses. PLoS One 2015;10:e0114836.
   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131