Page 157 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 157

Examination for Lameness  123

             SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF LAMENESS

  VetBooks.ir                                                    kevin G. keeGan





               The word  “lame” stems from the Proto‐Indo‐       horses with bilateral pain or disease to move symmetri­
             European language root lem, meaning literally “broken,”   cally, at least in some strides, especially when moving in
             with comparative usage in Old English (lame), Old   a straight line. But one limb is usually slightly worse,
                                                  31
             Norse (lami), and Proto‐Germanic (lahm).  The word   and an average asymmetry of movement, or lameness,
             lame is an adjective, as in a lame limb. In modern veteri­  over all strides is retained.  Axial skeletal disease in
             nary usage, we use a derivative of the word as the noun     particular may cause relatively equal amounts of pain
             lameness, the state of being lame. Lameness is a clinical   during both steps in a stride so that lameness may not be
             sign not a disease. 32,48  A synonym is limp, also used as a   displayed. However, most horses with musculoskeletal
             verb, as in “the horse limps.” A horse with lameness is a   disease will display lameness, and many horses that dis­
             limping horse.                                      play lameness have musculoskeletal disease.
               Most lameness is caused by pain during weight‐ bearing,   The asymmetric movement in horses with musculo­
             with shifting of load away from the source limb onto the   skeletal or neurologic abnormality causes a decrease in
             other three, non‐ or less afflicted, limbs. In human medi­  resultant ground reaction forces, because most pain or
             cine lameness due to pain on weight‐bearing is called   dysfunction occurs during weight‐bearing. Some abnor­
             antalgic (“against pain”) gait and is considered the medi­  malities may also cause pain in the swing (non‐weight‐
             cal term for “limping.” In the bipedal human the main   bearing)  phase  of  the  stride,  but  there  is  objective
             feature of antalgic gait is decreased duration of stance   evidence that the abnormal movement due to pain or
                                                  36
             time of the affected versus unaffected limb.  But this is   dysfunction in the swing phase of the stride affects kin­
             frequently not true in the quadruped equine unless the   ematics (and likely ground reaction forces) also in the
                                                                                       27
             lameness is severe, and, instead, it is a decrease in peak   stance phase of the stride.  In other words, pure swing­
             vertical ground reaction force on the affected limb that is   ing limb lameness conditions without weight‐bearing
             the primary effect of weight‐bearing pain. 10,54,55  But also   signs have not been shown to exist and if they do exist
             decreased vertical ground reaction force can be a sign of   are not common.  In addition, asymmetric limb move­
                                                                                9
             a comparative unilateral weakness, neurologic dysfunc­  ment without asymmetry in weight‐bearing, though
             tion, anatomical asymmetry, and, to a limited degree and   technically defined as lameness, is more likely simply a
             uncommonly, even primary functional asymmetry (hand­  sign  of conformational  difference  or  handedness  and
             edness, laterality), a dominance of one side of the brain in   not clinically significant as a sign of disease.
             controlling particular activities. Horses without pain,   Movement of the midline of the horse’s body, more
             neurologic abnormality, or weakness in the limbs or torso   precisely movement of the head and pelvis, in the same
             usually move symmetrically and are not lame.        sagittal plane of the body’s center of mass, is directly
               Detection of the clinical sign of lameness by observing   related to vertical ground reaction forces on the limbs
             the horse move in most situations is a simple concept. It is   during weight‐bearing.  Movements of the abaxial
                                                                                     13
             the recognition of asymmetric gait. However, it is more   appendages are  more naturally variable (right vs. left
             difficult in practice because of inherent limitations in spa­  and stride by stride) and more affected by idiosyncratic
             tial and temporal resolution of unaided human eyesight.   factors, like conformation and handedness (predomi­
             In contrast, determination of the cause and importance of   nance or preference of one side of the body over the
             lameness is frequently both difficult and complex, requir­  other). Higher variability and more complex association
             ing  detailed  knowledge  of  anatomy;  understanding  of   to multiple causative factors decrease the usefulness of
             how movement of the head, torso, and limbs are affected   specific limb movements to reliably signal painful
             by limb loading and unloading; a complete and systematic   weight‐bearing lameness. 1,44,45  For these reasons, obser­
             palpation and manipulation of the entire limb and torso;   vation of how the midline (head and torso) moves is
             knowledge of breed‐ and use‐specific diseases that cause   more sensitive and specific for weight‐bearing lameness
             lameness; localization of the focus of pain with local anes­  detection than evaluation of limb movement. Exceptions
             thesia; and quality imaging. Obtaining relevant history,   to this generalization include dorsiflexion of the fetlock
             visual examination of the horse at rest, and palpation and   during weight‐bearing and amplitude of hindlimb pro­
             manipulation of the limbs and torso are covered in earlier   traction, both of which, when decreased, have been
             chapters. Subjective evaluation of the horse during move­  shown to be reliable indicators of abnormality. 12,19,30
             ment to detect and assess lameness is the purpose of this   These are discussed later in this section.
             chapter.                                              However, there are a few musculoskeletal/neurologi­
               A horse without lameness moves symmetrically, with   cal abnormalities that are most easily recognized as spe­
             equal amplitude of movement in the head, torso,     cific “odd” limb movements and, if seen unilaterally,
             and limbs during the right and left halves of the stride.   satisfy the definition of lameness. Fibrotic myopathy of
             A  horse with lameness due to pain in a limb moves   the stifle flexor muscles, stringhalt, momentary or inter­
             asymmetrically.  This does not mean that all horses   mittent upward fixation of the patella, gastrocnemius
             with  musculoskeletal  or neuromuscular  abnormality   muscle injury, peroneus tertius rupture, and “shivers”
             move asymmetrically or show lameness. It is possible for   can be recognized merely by observing limb movement
   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162