Page 949 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 949

Principles of Therapy for Lameness  915




  VetBooks.ir



























             Figure 8.4.  Schematic illustration demonstrating the effect of   flexor moment remains approximately the same, the force in the
             moving the center of pressure in a palmar direction. The arm of the   deep digital flexor tendon is decreased. (Vectors represented by
             extensor moment becomes shorter, and because the arm of the   arrows are for illustrative purposes and do not represent real values.)

                               5
             of the distal phalanx.  Therefore, extending the effective   more smoothly, thereby decreasing the abruptness in
             border of the hoof distally at any point around its cir-  changes in stress in the underlying tissues.  To a lesser
                                                                                                     13
             cumference increases the tendency that the foot will land   extent the medial and lateral abaxial branches of the
             on the lengthened wall first. Extensions on the medial   shoe can be beveled to improve the ease of motion as a
             side of the foot of a horse should be used with caution   horse is turning. While this has not been explicitly stud-
             because of the risk of interference. Similarly, toe exten-  ied, it is known that a turning horse loads the side of the
                                                                                           25
             sions should be used with caution because they increase   hoof on the inside of the turn.  Therefore, it is rational
             the propensity of a horse to trip. Lateral extensions may   to anticipate that rolling or beveling the abaxial margins
             be used without such obvious side effects but are likely   of the shoe smoothes out the changes in stress in the
             to alter flight of the foot as the limb is protracted due to   underlying tissues on the ipsilateral side of the foot.
             increased air resistance, the magnitude, and significance
             of which have not been determined. Changing the width   Distribution of Force
             of the web of one branch of the shoe causes the foot to
             become asymmetrically weighted, changing the inertia   The main rationale for distributing part of the load of
             that must be overcome as the foot accelerates away from   weight‐bearing over more of the sole and frog is to
             the ground at breakover and decelerates at impact. The   reduce  load bearing  by  the  lamellae  and  wall, which
             significance of this effect has not been investigated.  assumes that most of the load is normally born by the
                                                                 wall.  This is frequently done by recruiting the entire
             Ease of Movement                                    ground surface in horses with laminitis. In those with
                                                                 underrun heels, reducing weight‐bearing by the heels is
               Clinicians have long thought that making the breako-  attempted by increasing weight‐bearing by the frog,
             ver point more palmar improves the function of the foot   bars, and angles of the sole.
             and relieves mild lameness, particularly that associated   However successful these manipulations appear clini-
             with palmar heel pain. However, several studies have   cally, the mechanical effectiveness of this manipulation
             examined the effect of changing breakover in this man-  is  uncertain  because  the  role of  the  sole  and  wall  in
             ner and have been unable to demonstrate a decrease in   weight‐bearing is poorly understood. It has been clearly
             the duration of the breakover or a change in the flight of   demonstrated that when a horse that has been at pasture
             the foot, 10,17  though it may cause the foot to breakover   barefoot stands on a firm surface, it bears weight in a
                                                                                15
             slightly earlier. Additionally, it does not change the peak   “4‐point” pattern , that is, on its heels and at the toe‐
             moment about the distal interphalangeal joint or the   quarter junctions. If the same horse is housed on con-
             peak force on the navicular bone, even though it    crete, the wear of the ground surface of its foot causes it
             decreases the length of the moment arm of the ground   to bear weight around more of the perimeter of its foot
             reaction force about that the distal interphalangeal joint   and frog. If the same horse is made to stand on sand, the
             at breakover (Figure 8.5). 10                       weight is distributed over a much greater area, which is
               The most likely explanation for the improvement   no longer distributed around the periphery of the foot
             seen by clinicians is that the foot breaks over (unrolls)   but over the sole in a band running from quarter to
   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954