Page 664 - Fluid, Electrolyte, and Acid-Base Disorders in Small Animal Practice
P. 664

Fluid Therapy with Macromolecular Plasma Volume Expanders  651


            transvascular fluid movement. The hydrostatic pressure  gradually more distended, it continues to oppose disten-
            within a blood vessel at any particular site depends in part  tion until a critical point is reached (suggested to corre-
            on where resistance to flow occurs, with hydrostatic  spond to the disordering of the interstitial matrix).
            pressures decreasing most across the areas of major resis-  Abruptly, the resistance to distention decreases (i.e., com-
            tance. In most tissues, the majority of resistance has been  pliance increases), and fluid then can accumulate without
            attributed to small arterioles, but experimental studies of  a corresponding protective increase in interstitial pressure
            the lung suggest that a significant pressure decrease may  and lymph flow. At this point, the distended interstitium
            occur across the capillary bed itself. 15,16,143    no longer opposes the movement of fluid and protein,
                                                                resulting in increased extravasation and self-perpetuation
            INTERSTITIAL                                        of the edemagenic process. Furthermore, the greatly
            HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE                                increased interstitial space provides a large volume for
            As with all the other Starling forces, normal interstitial  protein sequestration.
            pressure also varies among tissues. Interestingly, in many
            tissues the resting pressure is slightly negative (subatmo-  TISSUE SAFETY FACTORS
            spheric), tending to favor rather than oppose fluid filtra-  From the previous discussion, it should be apparent that
            tion from the microvasculature. 179  This finding has been  there are three main homeostatic mechanisms that pre-
            postulated to be the result of the molecular structure of  vent or limit accumulation of fluid in the interstitium.
            the interstitial matrix, such that with normal hydration  First, extravasation of fluid into a relatively nondistensible
            the biomechanical stresses on the molecules and the  interstitium results in an increased interstitial hydrostatic
            repulsion among like electrostatic charges act to expand  pressure that opposes further extravasation. Second, after
                         5
            the interstitium. In encapsulated organs, such as the kid-  extravasation of low-protein fluid, interstitial COP
            ney, normal interstitial pressures are positive. Interstitial  decreases because of dilution and washout of protein,
            pressures can also change depending on the functional  thereby maintaining or even enhancing the COP gradient
            state of the organ. For example, interstitial pressures in  between the intravascular space and interstitium. Third,
            the nonabsorbing intestine are negative to slightly posi-  the increased interstitial pressure results in an increased
            tive, whereas intestinal interstitial pressures are positive  driving pressure for lymphatic drainage. These alterations
            in the absorptive state. 70  As mentioned before, the  in Starling forces that act to limit interstitial fluid accumu-
            molecular structure of the interstitium mechanically  lation have been termed the tissue safety factors. 72,157
            opposes distention. Conventionally, it is said that one  Their relative importance varies depending on the
            third of the total body water is found in the extracellular  characteristics of the tissue. 5,33  In a tissue that is relatively
            space and that the interstitium constitutes three fourths  nondistensible (e.g., tendon), an increase in interstitial
            of the extracellular space. These figures are averages for  pressure may be the most important means by which to
            the whole body, and the relative sizes of the intravascular  counteract filtration. In a tissue with moderate
            and interstitial spaces vary among tissues. Tissues vary in  distensibility and with a relatively impermeable microvas-
            their  capacity  to  accommodate  interstitial  fluid  cular barrier (e.g., skin), the decrease in interstitial COP
            depending on the size of the interstitial space relative to  assumes more importance in protecting against intersti-
            the total volume of the tissue and the nature of the inter-  tial fluid accumulation. In a distensible tissue that is quite
            stitial matrix itself, especially its distensibility. The  permeable to protein (e.g., lungs), increased lymph flow
            distensibility of an organ or tissue is termed its compli-  appears to be the most important safeguard against inter-
            ance, and depending on the nature of the tissue, the com-  stitial edema. 183
            pliance of the interstitium may vary widely. Extreme
            examples would be tendon (which is relatively noncom-  PHARMACOKINETICS AND
            pliant) and loose subcutaneous connective tissue (which  PHARMACODYNAMICS OF
            is relatively distensible). The accumulation of edema fluid
            in the peribronchovascular interstitium in canine lungs is  MACROMOLECULAR PLASMA
            likely the result of the higher compliance of this region of  VOLUME EXPANDERS
            the pulmonary interstitium.
              An extremely important concept related to the intersti-  Transvascular fluid dynamics are extremely complex. The
            tial hydrostatic pressure is that of stress relaxation. In a  balance of the hydrostatic and osmotic pressure gradients
            normally hydrated animal, the interstitium in most tissues  between  the  intravascular  and  interstitial  fluid
            is relatively noncompliant. Small increases in volume  compartments forms the basis for microvascular fluid
            caused by increased fluid extravasation result in large  exchange. However, this simple concept is belied by the
            changes in interstitial hydrostatic pressure that act to  great heterogeneity in Starling forces and transvascular
            oppose further extravasation of fluid and increase lym-  fluid dynamics that exists among and within tissues in
            phatic drainage pressure—two of the tissue safety factors  both healthy and diseased states. The relative importance
            described later. 72,157  As the interstitium becomes  of the different tissue safety factors also varies among
   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669