Page 219 - Cote clinical veterinary advisor dogs and cats 4th
P. 219

92    Atopic Dermatitis


           PHYSICAL EXAM FINDINGS               Staphylococcus spp and Malassezia spp fre-  •  Poor correlation between intradermal and
           Dogs:                                quently  cause  severe  disease  exacerbation   serologic testing; none of them is standard-
  VetBooks.ir  rubbing, scooting, head shaking), initially   •  The role of food allergens as possible triggers   information for avoidance and allergen-
                                                                                   ized. It is probable that the most appropriate
                                                through secondary infection.
           •  Pruritus  (scratching,  licking,  chewing,
                                                for atopic dermatitis is currently accepted.
                                                                                   specific immunotherapy (ASIT) would be
            with mild or no visible lesions
           •  Possible primary erythema (macules or small
                                                                                   on every patient, but this may not always
            papules)                           DIAGNOSIS                           gathered by performing both types of testing
           •  Areas  most  commonly  affected  include                             be practical.
            muzzle, periocular region, ears, flexor aspect   Diagnostic Overview  •  Mite  infestations  (Sarcoptes,  Notoedres,
            of elbows, carpal and tarsal joints, interdigital   The diagnosis of atopic dermatitis is based on   Otodectes, Cheyletiella) cause cross-reactions
            spaces, axillary and inguinal areas, ventrum,   history, physical examination, and ruling out   with house dust and storage mite antigens,
            and perianal area.                other causes of a similar presentation. Although   often resulting in false-positive reactions in
           •  Different  phenotypes  exist  (e.g.,  dorsum   a different set of clinical criteria have been   intradermal and blood testing. These infesta-
            commonly affected in Chinese Shar-peis and   proposed in dogs to help support a diagnosis   tions should be treated and allergy testing
            Labrador retrievers; urticaria is common in   of atopic dermatitis (the latest one being the   postponed for 3-4 months if possible.
            boxers).                          Favrot criteria), there is common agreement   •  Annual  vaccinations  can  cause  increased
           •  Secondary skin lesions: excoriations, alopecia,   that the diagnosis should not be based exclu-  levels of allergen-specific IgE for up to 3
            hyperpigmentation, lichenification, crusting  sively on any set of criteria.  weeks.
           •  Saliva staining of hair may be noted.                              •  In  geographic  areas  with  well-defined,
           •  Secondary bacterial and yeast infections of   Differential Diagnosis  pronounced pollen and mold seasons, allergy
            skin and ears, and acute moist dermatitis   •  Ectoparasites: Sarcoptes, Demodex (especially   testing is best performed at season’s end or
            (hot spots) may also be noted (pp. 247 and   D. gatoi and D. injai), Cheyletiella, Notoedres,   within 2 months after the peak allergy
            851).                               Otodectes, Trombicula, fleas, lice  season.
           Cats:                              •  Bacterial infections: especially Staphylococcus   •  Drug therapy can suppress allergy test results.
           •  Pruritus  (including  excessive  grooming)   pseudintermedius        ○   Withdraw oral, topical, and long-acting
            rapidly leading to excoriation, especially face,   •  Fungal infections: Malassezia, dermatophy-  injectable glucocorticoids for 2-3, 2, and
            pinnae, and neck                    tosis                                4-8 weeks, respectively. This applies to
           •  Papulocrustous (miliary) dermatitis: especially   •  Other hypersensitivities: fleas, food, contact,   intradermal and serologic testing.
            dorsum                              drug                               ○   Withdraw antihistamines and omega-6/
           •  Eosinophilic  granuloma  complex  lesions:   •  Behavioral  disorders:  feline  psychogenic   omega-3 fatty acid–containing  supple-
            indolent ulcer (upper lip), eosinophilic   alopecia (rare)               ments  and diets  at  least 7  days  before
            plaque (mainly ventral abdomen), eosino-  •  Neoplasia: epitheliotropic lymphoma  intradermal testing.
            philic granuloma (p. 300).                                             ○   Cyclosporine does not appear to affect
           •  Self-induced  alopecia:  more  or  less  sym-  Initial Database        allergy test results. However, withdrawal
            metrical (especially abdomen, medial thighs,   •  The minimum database for a pruritic patient   for days to weeks might be considered if
            front limbs, rump)                  should include a complete history and   administered for a number of months.
                                                physical examination and a thorough der-  ○   Oclacitinib and lokivetmab (Apoquel and
           Etiology and Pathophysiology         matologic examination for ectoparasites,   Cytopoint) do not appear to interfere with
           •  Atopic  dermatitis  is  a  genetically  pro-  bacteria, and yeast.     results of intradermal or serologic testing.
            grammed, multifactorial, allergic skin disease   •  An initial dermatologic database (p. 1091)  ○   Avoid acepromazine, oxymorphone, and
            in which the patient becomes sensitized to   ○   Skin scrapings          morphine if sedating the patient for
            environmental allergens.            ○   Trichography                     intradermal testing.
           •  Atopic animals are thought to have a defec-  ○   Skin and ear cytologic examination
            tive epidermal barrier function (aggravated   ○   +/− Fungal culture in cats   TREATMENT
            by numerous factors such as the diet,
            microbial exposure, stress, climate, exposure   Advanced or Confirmatory Testing  Treatment Overview
            to skin irritant) and polarization toward a   Testing for allergen-specific IgE (allergy testing)  •  Atopic dermatitis is almost always a lifelong
            type 2 helper T lymphocyte (T H2) immu-  •  Should be performed only when the diagnosis   problem, and the goal is to eliminate or
            nologic response (resulting in high levels of   of atopic dermatitis is supported by history,   minimize allergen exposure while maintain-
            IgE).                               clinical presentation, dermatologic findings,   ing the pet’s comfort and homeostasis of the
           •  Predisposed patients percutaneously absorb   and ruling out other differential diagnoses  skin.
            allergens that provoke the production of   •  Allergy tests do not diagnose allergy; they   •  Appropriate clinical protocol depends on the
            allergen-specific IgE.              only document sensitization, which may have   seasonality of the problem, distribution and
           •  Inhalation or ingestion of allergen may be   no clinical significance.  severity of lesions, concurrent health issues,
            of lesser significance.           •  Allergy testing is available as an intradermal   patient and client compliance, and cost and
           •  After  a  sensitization  phase,  epidermal   test performed by veterinary dermatologists   availability of therapy. It typically requires
            Langerhans cells capture allergens with   or as a blood test (serologic testing offered   adjustment over time.
            antigen-specific  IgE,  provoking  a  storm   by numerous commercial laboratories).   •  Allergen  avoidance  is  ideal  but  rarely
            of cytokine and chemokine release from   Regardless of method, test results must be   possible.
            keratinocytes, mast cells, and infiltrating   reviewed in light of allergen exposure and   •  Although ASIT is the sole therapy inducing
            eosinophils, neutrophils, allergen-specific   the patient’s history.   immune tolerance to the offending allergens,
            T H 2 lymphocytes, and dermal dendritic cells.  •  Intradermal testing: considered gold standard,   additional antipruritic therapy is often required.
           •  Dogs and cats are most commonly sensitized   but animals must be clipped and sedated.  •  Secondary  yeast  and  bacterial  infections
            to  house  dust  and  storage  mites,  molds,   •  Serologic testing: false-positives are common   should be controlled by appropriate therapy
            pollens, and danders.               but more convenient and less affected by   before any attempt is made to further control
           •  Malassezia antigens may represent major   antipruritic therapies. No clinical correlation   pruritus.
            allergens, but staphylococcal antigens are not   associated with the number and magnitude   •  Antiparasitic preventives should be adminis-
            currently  proven  to  have  a  role.  Both     of positive reactions.  tered to avoid pruritic parasitic infestation.

                                                     www.ExpertConsult.com
   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224