Page 492 - The Veterinary Laboratory and Field Manual 3rd Edition
P. 492

Wildlife health and disease surveillance  429


                was not found until hunters who participated in   The integrative and participatory muskox
                the hunter-based sampling programme observed   health surveillance programme implemented
                those same lesions. This triggered a field dis-  in Cambridge Bay has been transferred to other
                ease investigation that allowed the pathogen   northern communities with the aim of increasing
                responsible of those reported lesions (orf virus)   the geographic scope of the surveillance system.
                to be scientifically identified, and that also   Although these efforts are in an early stage of
                identified other diseases relevant in the sys-  implementation, a similar approach is now being
                tem (that is, brucellosis, lungworm infection)   used by these communities to assess the health
                (Figure 11.5).                           status of caribou in the terrestrial environment
                  This last example, among others, illustrates   and of narwhal in the marine environment.
                well how complementary use of local and sci-  The surveillance approach described here can
                entific knowledge can greatly enhance the   also be transferred to other settings and other
                outcomes of a wildlife disease surveillance sys-  wildlife species. In such different contexts, the
                tem. In addition, including resource users in the   programme will need to be tailored to local reali-
                knowledge-generating process fosters dialogue   ties and take into account the resources available,
                and trust among parties and promotes shared   as well as the challenges and opportunities that
                ownership and shared responsibility. These can   exist. The checklist and considerations, in Box
                improve the sustainability of the surveillance   11.1, apply widely and can guide the develop-
                system over time, as well as co-management   ment of a participatory wildlife  surveillance
                outcomes for the species.                programme to help generate positive outcomes.



























                Figure 11.5  Examples of field disease investigations. (A) Field necropsy of a muskox cow found dead.
                The individual performing the necropsy is wearing personal protective equipment (PPE: goggles, mask,
                gloves, and disposable coveralls). (B) A toolkit for wildlife disease field sampling: necropsy and sampling
                tools, extra PPE, disinfectants, and other materials are kept in a modified tackle box that is compact and
                easy to transport. (C) Every sample collected in the field is stored in a leak-proof bag and identified imme-
                diately with the identification number of the animal and a brief description of the tissue sampled. Photos:
                courtesy of Matilde Tomaselli.







       Vet Lab.indb   429                                                                  26/03/2019   10:26
   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497