Page 1058 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 1058

1024   Chapter 9




  VetBooks.ir




















































            Figure 9.62.  (Left) Evaluation of an American Saddlebred for   rack. Note the right hindlimb lameness, which should be flipped to a
            lameness at the trot. A clear left hindlimb lack of pushoff and impact   left hindlimb lameness due to the data collection of an ipsilateral
            lameness are found with variation (standard deviations) of Diff Max   gait. Also, note the relatively high variation compared with means of
            and Diff Min Pelvis less than mean indicating good consistency.   Diff Max and Diff Min Pelvis, with standard deviations greater than
            (Right) Evaluation of the same American Saddlebred horse at the   means.

            running walk of the Tennessee Walking Horse. Therefore,     3.  Axelsson M, Björnsdottir P, Eksell P, et al. Risk factors associated
            forelimb results will be reliable, but hindlimb results will   with hindlimb lameness and degenerative joint disease in the dis­
                                                                  tal tarsus of Icelandic horses. Equine Vet J 2001;33:84–90.
            be unreliable. The pace is a two‐beat, lateralized gait     4.  Barrey E. Gaits and interlimb coordination. In Equine Locomotion, 2nd
            with a moment of suspension between footfalls. Forelimb   ed. Back W, Clayton HM, eds. Elsevier Saunders, London, 2013;85–91.
            results will be reliable, and hindlimb results will be     5.  Bennet SD. Lameness in the American Saddlebred and other trot­
            opposite of true.                                     ting breeds with collection. In Diagnosis and Management of
                                                                  Lameness in the Horse, 2nd ed. Ross MW, Dyson SJ, eds. Elsevier
                                                                  Saunders, St. Louis, MO, 2011;1188–1195.
                                                                 6.  Biknevicius AR, Mullineaux DR, Clayton HM. Locomotor mechan­
            References                                            ics of the tölt in Icelandic horses. Am J Vet Res 2006;67:1505–1510.
                                                                 7.  Blackford JT, Sternberg JC.  Walking horses. In Diagnosis and
              1.  Agricultural Communications,  Texas  A&M University System.   Management of Lameness in the Horse, 2nd ed. Ross MW, Dyson
               Gaited’ Gene Mutation and Related Motion Examined.  The   SJ, eds. Elsevier Saunders, St. Louis, MO, 2011;1186–1188.
               Horse. Blood‐Horse Publications, 5 September 2012.    8.  Breeds that Gait. Equus 2007;359(August):52–54.
              2.  Andersson LS, Lahammar M, Memic F, et  al. Mutations in     9.  Clayton HM. Comparison of the stride kinematics of the col­
               DMRT3 affect locomotion in horses and spinal circuit function in   lected, working, medium and extended trot in horses. Equine Vet
               mice. Nature 2012;488:642–646. doi:10.1038/nature11399.  J 1994;26:230–234.
   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063