Page 57 - Clinical Small Animal Internal Medicine
P. 57

3  Using Data for Clinical Decision Making  25

                 Studies where individuals serve as their own controls     Conclusion
  VetBooks.ir  lead to collection of dependent data, in which measure-  Using data to make causal inferences is a hallmark of evi-
               ments from the same individual are correlated. This
               arises, for example, when readings are taken from both
               eyes, when blood parameters are sequentially monitored,   dence‐based medicine, but no inferences will be correct
                                                                  if the evidence used to establish them is flawed. Research
               or when drug concentrations are evaluated for half‐lives.   can generate new knowledge, but it can also embed
               Conventional statistical procedures assume that data are   flawed conclusions in the literature if sedulous attention
               independent, but when data are paired or repeatedly col-  is not afforded to proper study design and conduct. Even
               lected from the same individual, the independence   the most sophisticated statistical methods cannot sup-
               assumption is violated, which leads to invalid hypothesis   plant biases that insidiously enter studies through flaws
               test results, typically erroneously low P‐values and higher   in study design. Despite the zeal that investigators have
               than planned type I error proportions. Analysis of   for finding statistically significant study results, reported
               dependent data typically requires specialized statistical   point and variance estimates, confidence intervals, and
               methods, from Student’s t‐tests or the nonparametric   P‐values will be incorrect unless great care is exercised in
               Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests for paired data, to one‐way   designing and establishing the central features of a clini-
               repeated measures analysis of variance or the nonpara-  cal study: thoughtful selection of comparison groups,
               metric Friedman test for sequential observations, to mul-  unbiased and masked collection of information, diligent
               tivariate models, such as mixed effects analysis of variance   follow‐up of patients, proper specification of statistical
               or linear regression models for more complex designs.  models, and verification of the model assumptions.


                 References


                 1  Buhles W, Kass PH. Understanding and evaluating     3  Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady
                 veterinary clinical research. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc   DG, Newman T. Designing Clinical Research,
                 2012; 48(5): 285–98.                               4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams &
                 2  Lecouteur RA. It’s time. Vet Surg 2007; 36(5): 390–5.  Wilkins, 2013.
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62