Page 126 - Avian Virology: Current Research and Future Trends
P. 126

Avian Metapneumoviruses



          Paul A. Brown* and Nicolas Eterradossi                                                            4




          VIPAC (Virology, Immunology and Parasitology in Poultry & Rabbits) Unit, ANSES (French Agency for Food, Environmental
           and Occupational Health Safety), Ploufragan-Plouzané-Niort Laboratory, Ploufragan, France.
          *Correspondence: paul.brown@anses.fr
          https://doi.org/10.21775/9781912530106.04







          Abstract                                              flocks in South Africa. Shortly after, the disease was reported in
          Avian metapneumoviruses (AMPV), discovered in the late 1970s   Europe were the virus was isolated (Giraud et al., 1986; McDou-
          in South Africa, and now detected in almost all parts of the world,   gall and Cook, 1986; Wilding et al., 1986) and later classified as
          are classified in the order Mononegavirales, family Pneumoviridae,   avian pneumovirus (APV) (Cavanagh and Barrett, 1988; Collins
          genus Metapneumovirus, together with the more recently identi-  and Gough, 1988; Ling and Pringle, 1988). This initial classifica-
          fied human metapneumovirus (HMPV). AMPVs are responsible   tion was based on its close genetic and structural relationships to
          for respiratory diseases in poultry resulting in high morbidity and   respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) which had been discovered 30
          variable mortality depending on the severity of bacterial second-  years previously in cases of respiratory infection in chimpanzees
          ary infections. In breeding birds, a drop in egg production, and   (Blount et al., 1956). Two notable differences however, were
          quality of egg, can often follow. To date, four subgroups have   observed between APV and RSV: (i) the absence of approxi-
          been defined (A, B, C and D) based on genetic and antigenic   mately 1000 nucleotides in the APV genome which in RSV were
          properties for which differential laboratory diagnostic tools have   known to encode two biologically active, non-structural proteins
          been developed. The principal host species of AMPV are turkeys,   NS1  and NS2  (Randhawa et al.,  1997) (see  ‘Viral   proteins’,
          chickens and ducks, although other bird species can be infected.   below) and (ii) the order in which the genes appeared in the
          Subgroup susceptibility changes with bird species. Subgroup C   genome (Ling et al., 1992) (see ‘Genome structure and organi-
          viruses appear to have the broadest host range and, interestingly,   zation’, below). In 2001 a new respiratory virus in humans was
          show a closer genetic relationship to HMPV than to other AMPV   detected that had the same genome composition, structure and
          subgroups. This cross-species genetic resemblance between   organization as APV (van den Hoogen et al., 2001). The discov-
          AMPV-C and HMPV reflects common ancestry and a compara-  ery and isolation of several of these viruses from humans and in
          tive virological approach may improve our understanding of both   consideration that they, together with the APV isolates, emerged
          viruses within the frame of future ‘one health’ metapneumovirus   after the discovery of RSV, led to the addition of the Greek prefix
          projects. Conversely, significant differences between AMPV sub-  Meta (equivalent to post or ad in Latin) to the genus pneumovirus
          groups A, B, D and AMPV-C suggest that knowledge gained from   and thus the classification: avian and human Metapneumoviruses
          studies of either group of AMPVs may not be readily transferred   in the family Pneumoviridae, order Mononegavirales (Afonso et al.,
          to the other. A good level of protection against AMPV infection   2016).
          can  be achieved  in  chickens or turkeys by  careful  vaccination   To date four subgroups have been defined for the avian
          using a combination of live attenuated and inactivated vaccines,   metapneumoviruses (AMPV-A, B, C and D) based on genetic
          together with good farm practices; however, several studies have   and  antigenic  differences (Brown et al.,  2014)  and two sub-
          shown that some live vaccines can revert to virulence causing   groups for the human metapneumoviruses (HMPV-A and B).
          problems in the flock. To address this, attempts have been made   Genetic sublineages have been defined within HMPV subgroups
          to generate more stable live vaccines with reverse genetics, yet   and AMPV-C, the latter forming two genetic lineages: one in
          still no recombinant AMPV  vaccine has been commercialized   Muscovy ducks in France and Asia (Toquin et al., 1999a; Sun
          since the development of the first system in 2004.    et al., 2014;) and another in turkeys and wild birds in the USA
          This chapter gives an up-to-date review of the literature and per-  (Senne et al., 1997; Cook et al., 1999; Shin et al., 2000; Bennett
          spectives for AMPV.                                   et al., 2004; Toquin et al., 2006b; Turpin et al., 2008). Recently
                                                                an AMPV-C has also been isolated from chickens in China (Wei
                                                                et  al., 2013). Several studies have shown that the subgroup C
          Introduction and history                              viruses are more closely related to HMPV than they are to the
          Respiratory disease resulting from Avian Metapneumovirus   other avian subgroups (Yunus et al., 2003; Govindarajan et al.,
          (AMPV) infection was first described in the late 1970s in turkey   2004; Govindarajan and Samal, 2004, 2005; Brown et al., 2014)
   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131