Page 219 - Avian Virology: Current Research and Future Trends
P. 219

212  |  Zheng

          Virus characteristics

          Classification and structure of IBDV
          IBDV is a non-enveloped double-stranded (ds) RNA virus.
          The viral particle is a icosahedral capsid with a diameter of
          about 60 nm (Dobos et al., 1979; Müller et al., 2003). As the
          virus contains two segments of double-stranded RNA (A and
          B)  (Azad et al.,  1985),  it  is  classified  into  the  genus  Avibir-
          navirus, family  Birnaviridae. Whereas the short RNA, segment
          B (2.8 kb) encodes VP1, a RNA-dependent RNA polymerase
          (RdRp) (Morgan et al., 1988; von Einem et al., 2004), segment
          A, the large molecule (3.17 kb) contains two partially overlap-  Figure 7.1  Schematic  illustration  of  IBDV  virion  particle.  IBDV
          ping open reading frames (ORFs) (Hudson et al., 1986; Spies et   contains two segments of double-stranded RNA (A and B). Segment
                                                                B (Seg B), the short RNA (2.8 kb), encodes VP1, a RNA-dependent
          al., 1989). The first ORF encodes the non-structural viral pro-  RNA  polymerase  (RdRp)  and  genome-linked  protein  of  IBDV.
          tein 5 (VP5) (Mundt et al., 1995; Lombardo et al., 2000), and   Segment  A  (Seg  A),  the  large  molecule  (3.17  kb),  contains  two
          the second one encodes a 110-kDa polyprotein precursor that   partially  overlapping  open  reading  frames  (ORFs).  The  first  ORF
          can be cleaved by the proteolytic activity of VP4 to form viral   encodes non-structural protein VP5, and the second one encodes
                                                                a 110-kDa polyprotein precursor that can be cleaved to form viral
          proteins VP2, VP3, and VP4 (Hudson et al., 1986; Jagadish et   proteins VP2, VP3, and VP4. VP1 is involved in the efficiency of
          al.,  1988;  Kibenge  et  al.,  1991).  VP2  and  VP3  are  the  major   viral  replication  and  modulates  the  virulence.  VP2,  a  structural
          structural proteins, constituting 51% and 40% of the virion,   protein, acts as a viral ligand binding to the receptor on host cell
          respectively (Dobos et al., 1979; Todd and McNulty, 1979;   membrane for virus attachment, an initial step of IBDV infection.
                                                                VP3, a scaffold protein, interacts with the structural protein VP2 and
          Tacken et al., 2000). VP4 is a classical cis-cleavage protein and   recruits genome dsRNA and VP1 to form a ribonucleoprotein (RNP)
          its trans-activity is present but acts later in the life cycle of a   complex, playing a critical role in virus assembly.
          double-stranded RNA virus (Birghan  et  al., 2000; Lejal  et  al.,
          2000). VP4 is able to cleave in trans and is responsible for the
          interdomain proteolytic autoprocessing of the pVP2-VP4-VP3   Genetic variation and virulence of IBDV
          polyprotein encoded by RNA segment A into pVP2 precur-  An  eminent  feature  of  RNA  virus  is  the  genetic  variation  due
          sor (512 residues, 54.4 kDa) as well as VP4 (28 kDa) and VP3   to the low proof-reading activity of their viral replicases. As a
          (32 kDa) (Lejal et al., 2000; Wang et al., 2015). Both VP4 and   dsRNA virus, IBDV displays high genetic variations mostly in
          the puromycin-sensitive aminopeptidase (PurSA) cleave the   VP2 hyper variable region (HVR) that lies in the central region
          pVP2 at its C-terminus to generate the intermediate pVP2 (452   between residues 212 and 332 aa, in which most of the amino acid
          residues) (Irigoyen et al., 2012), which is further processed   substitutions occurs (Vakharia et al., 1994a), leading to antigenic
          by the VP4 viral protease and by VP2 itself to generate the   variation, and this region is also related to the viral attachment
          mature VP2 (441 residues) (Irigoyen et al., 2009). The mature   since VP2 induces neutralizing antibodies. Sequencing analysis of
          VP2 with a variable amount of pVP2 (452 residues) and VP3   VP2 is very helpful to determine if the IBDV strain of interest is
          assemble the single shelled capsid of IBDV (Saugar et al., 2005;   a ‘classical’, vvIBDV or variant strains because of high sequence
          Luque et al., 2007). VP3 acts as a scaffold protein that binds   diversity  in  the  HVR  of  serotype  1  (Zierenberg et al.,  2000;
          both  the  viral  double-stranded  RNA  and  VP1  (Lombardo et   Banda and Villegas, 2004; Owoade et al., 2004; Shehata et al.,
          al., 1999), and the interaction of VP1 and VP3 is sufficient   2017). Interestingly, attenuation of vvIBDV Gx strain via passage
          to form a virus-like particle (VLP) insect cells (Maraver et al.,   in specific-pathogen free (SPF) chicken embryos and in chicken
          2003). As shown in Fig. 7.1, VP3 interacts with both VP2 and   embryo fibroblast (CEF) cell cultures indicates that the changes
          VP1, forming virion particle. VP5, a highly basic, cysteine-rich,   in amino acid sequences of VP2, VP3 and VP5 occurred at 9 pas-
          17 kDa non-structural (NS) protein is conserved among all   sages in CEF (CEF-9) associated with a remarkable reduction in
          serotype I of IBDV strains. This protein is not required for   the virulence of Gx strain (Wang et al., 2004, 2007). However, the
          viral replication (Mundt et al., 1997; Qin et al., 2010), but can   exact virulence factor of IBDV needs to be clarified because IBDV
          be detected in IBDV-infected cells (Mundt et al., 1995, 1997;   virulence seems to be affected by several viral components such
          Lombardo et al., 2000). Among the viral proteins of IBDV, VP2   as VP1 (Liu and Vakharia, 2004; Yu et al., 2013), VP2 (Toroghi et
          and VP5 are major factors responsible for IBDV-induced apop-  al., 2001; van Loon et al., 2002), VP3 (Boot et al., 2002), and VP5
          tosis (Fernández-Arias et al., 1997; Yao and Vakharia, 2001;   (Qin et al., 2009).
          Li et al.,  2012),  while  VP3  and  VP4  are  more  likely  involved   Using the reverse genetics system, it was found that the VP1
          in suppression or evasion of host immune response (Li et al.,   protein of IBDV is involved in the efficiency of viral replication
          2013; Ye et al., 2014; He et al., 2018). Although the genome   and modulates the virulence in vivo (Liu and Vakharia, 2004).
          of IBDV encodes a limited number of components, these viral   Substitution of amino acid (V4I) of VP1 attenuates viral patho-
          components may perform multiple functions in host via inter-  genicity and reduces viral replication in SPF chickens but increases
          action with cellular target proteins.                 viral replication in CEF cells (Yu et al., 2013), indicating that VP1
   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224