Page 256 - Avian Virology: Current Research and Future Trends
P. 256

Chicken Infectious Anaemia Virus



          Karel A. Schat*                                                                                   9




          Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

          *Correspondence: kas24@cornell.edu
          https://doi.org/10.21775/9781912530106.09






          Abstract                                              the presence of antibodies to CAV in chicken sera which were
          Chicken anaemia virus (CAV) is the only member of the genus   banked in 1959. Based on the pathogenesis of CAV infection in
          Gyrovirus  of the family  Anelloviridae. It has a single-stranded,   SPF chickens (see section ‘Transmission of CAV in SPF flocks’)
          covalently linked circular DNA genome of 2.3 kb coding for three   Miller and Schat (2004) suggested that CAV is most likely an
          viral proteins (VPs). VP1 forms the capsid and is the only protein   ancient pathogen that has been present in jungle fowl for a long
          in the virus particles. VP2 has multiple functions, which are essen-  time.
          tial for the formation of the virus particles. VP3 causes apoptosis   Virus isolation was originally performed by serial passage in
          in vitro and in vivo. VP3, also known as Apoptin, is investigated   1-day-old chicks until it was learned that the Marek’s Disease-
          as a potential anticancer treatment for human tumours. The pro-  derived, lymphoblastoid  Chicken  Cell line (MDCC)-MSB1
          moter/enhancer region resembles oestrogen response elements   could be used for isolation and propagation of CAV (Yuasa,
          and transcription can be activated by oestrogen and repressed   1983).  Since then,  CAV  isolations  and the  presence of  CAV
          by chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter transcription factor   antibodies have been reported from all continents with a poultry
          1. Viral DNA can remain present in the gonads of chickens with   industry. CAV infection is important for the poultry industry
          or without virus-neutralizing (VN) antibodies. Transfer of viral   for several reasons. First of all, infection of newly hatched chicks
          DNA through the embryo can occur independently of the pres-  lacking maternal antibodies causes severe anaemia and mortality.
          ence of VN antibodies. Infection of 1-day-old chicks without   Secondly, infection after 2 to 3 weeks of age can result in sub-
          maternal antibodies causes apoptosis of the haematopoietic cells   clinical immunosuppression leading to increased susceptibility to
          in the bone marrow and thymocytes in the thymus cortex causing   other diseases and decreased responses to vaccinations. Finally,
          anaemia and immunosuppression. Infection after 2 to 3 weeks   CAV has been, and still is, a major problem for the SPF industry,
          of age does not cause clinical disease but may cause subclinical   and by extension for vaccine producers, with breaks occurring
          immunosuppression. Vaccination of pullets between 9 and 15   after the development of sexual maturity.
          weeks of age prevents clinical disease in newly hatched chickens
          by the transfer of maternal antibodies.
                                                                Infectious agent

          Introduction and history                              Classification
          Chicken infectious anaemia virus (CAV or CIAV) was first   The classification of CAV has been changed several times since
          described by Yuasa et al. (1979). This small virus (< 25 nm)   1979. Originally, CAV was named chicken anaemia agent (CAA)
          was  obtained from a  flock  of chickens, which  were vaccinated   because at that time it did not fit in any known virus family
          with Marek’s disease (MD) vaccine contaminated with reticu-  (Yuasa et al., 1979). Gelderblom et al. (1989) found that CAA
          loendotheliosis virus (REV) (Yuasa et al., 1976) in addition   structurally resembled porcine circovirus (PCV), a contaminant
          to CAV. It is not uncommon that research and commercial   in the porcine kidney cell line PK15 (Tischer et al., 1982). They
          specific-pathogen-free (SPF) flocks are contaminated with CAV   proposed renaming CAA as CAV or perhaps avian circovirus. In
          (McNulty et al., 1989; Fadly et al., 1994; Cardona et al., 2000b;   addition to structural  similarities,  both  viruses possess  a  cova-
          Schat and Van Santen, 2013). Although CAV was first described   lently closed circular single-stranded DNA genome (Claessens et
          in 1979, the virus has been around for a long time. Jakowski et   al., 1991; Noteborn et al., 1991; Meehan et al., 1992). Ritchie et al.
          al. (1970) reported a case of haematopoietic destruction in MD   (1989) isolated a virus from cockatoos with psittacine beak and
          virus (MDV) infected chickens. Years later, Wellenstein (personal   feather disease (PBFD) with similar characteristics: 14–16 nm in
          communication, 1989; quoted in Schat and Van Santen, 2013)   diameter with an icosahedral structure and a covalently closed
          isolated a CAV strain from original tumour material saved from   circular single-stranded DNA genome. The similarities between
          this case. Using banked chicken sera, Toro et al. (2006) reported   PCV, CAV and PBDF virus (PBFDV) led Studdert (1993) to
   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261