Page 276 - Avian Virology: Current Research and Future Trends
P. 276

Chicken Infectious Anaemia Virus |   269

          positive semen can be a source of infection resulting in vertical   pi. Maximum virus titres were obtained between 7 and 21 days
          transmission. Parent and grandparent flocks can also transmit   pi when VN antibodies were present. Rectal contents were posi-
          viral  DNA  to  the  embryos  even  in  the  presence  of  high  titres   tive from 1 to 49 days pi, thus well after the development of VN
          of  VN  antibodies  (Brentano et al.,  2005;  Hailemariam et al.,   antibodies. At 42 and 49 days pi CAV could still be detected in a
          2008) like the transfer of viral DNA in SPF flocks. The practi-  few organs. Using histology and immunohistochemistry, Smyth
          cal importance of the transfer of viral DNA to the embryos in   et al.  (1993)  detected  CAV  antigen  at  3  days  pi  in  the  bone
          commercial settings is unknown at the current time.   marrow and at 4 days pi in thymus, spleen and lung. At 11 days
                                                                pi most of the other organs had positive aggregates of lymphoid
          Transmission through contaminated vaccines            cells. Antigen remained present in the thymus until 20 days pi,
          Since the first description of CAV by Yuasa et al. (1979) reports   but other organs were negative at 16 days pi. It is unknown which
          have been published that SPF flocks seroconverted to CAV (e.g.   cells become infected first in the host after intramuscular, oral or
          McNulty et al., 1989). Recently, Li et al. (2016b) reported a 20%   ocular inoculation.
          seroconversion in a SPF flock and isolated CAV from one of the   Anaemia typically develops between 8 and 10 days pi and
          antibody positive chickens. The reasons that SPF flocks experi-  recovers between 20 and 28 days pi (Taniguchi et al., 1983; Smyth
          ence breaks has been discussed in a previous section.  et al., 1993). In parallel with the decrease in haematocrit values
            Nicholas et al. (1989) and Kulcsar et al. (2010) examined   the numbers of white blood cells and thrombocytes declined
          24 and 27 batches of live vaccines, respectively, without finding   (Taniguchi et al., 1983).
          evidence for CAV contamination. In contrast, recent testing of   The first histological changes are detected in the bone marrow
          vaccines showed 2/14 (Li et al., 2017) and 7/31 (Varela et al.,   and thymus between 4 and 5 days (Taniguchi et al., 1983; Goryo
          2014) batches to be contaminated with CAV. The latter group   et al., 1989a; Jeurissen et al., 1989; Hu et al., 1993b; Smyth et al.,
          also showed that 8/31 batches were contaminated with AGV2.   1993). In the bone marrow some enlarged hemocytoblasts are
          The difference in detection of CAV in vaccines may reflect the   present, which may contain eosinophilic intranuclear inclusion
          different methods used to examine vaccine batches for CAV   bodies. Over the next few days hypoplasia develops followed
          contamination. An accepted method for the detection and   by aplasia with replacement of the hemocytoblasts by fatty cells
          identification of extraneous CAV by PCR can be found on the   (Fig. 9.11). Between 18 and 28 days pi the bone marrow becomes
          USDA-APHIS website under number VIRPRO0118.05.        hypercellular with extensive hemopoietic activity leading to res-
            CAV contaminated MD vaccines are an excellent vehicle   toration of haematocrit values and normal levels of granulocytes
          to introduce CAV into poultry flocks as demonstrated by the   and thrombocytes. Changes in the thymus start around 4 to 5
          original isolation of CAV by Yuasa et al. (1979). MD vaccines   days pi with the appearance of some enlarged lymphoblasts in the
          are produced in primary CEF prepared from SPF embryos. If   cortex followed by lymphoblast depletion starting between 5 to 6
          CAV is present in the embryos it is likely to be present in the   days pi (Fig. 9.9). Between 14 and 21 days pi, the percentage of
                                                                            +
                                                                    +
          vaccine, which is injected in ovo at ED18 or at one day of age. If   CD4  and CD8  cells is sharply reduced compared with controls.
          CAV-contaminated vaccine is inoculated into embryos or 1-day-  Regeneration of the thymus cortex starts around 21 days pi and at
          old chicks lacking maternal antibodies, clinical disease is likely to   28 days there is no difference in cell populations between infected
          occur.                                                and control birds.
                                                                  The return to normal histology for the bone marrow and
          Pathogenesis in young chickens (1 to 7 days           thymus coincides with the development of VN antibodies, which
          of age)                                               starts around 14 days pi. However, virus can be shed for 2 to 5
          The pathogenesis of CAV has been studied in 1-day-old SPF   weeks after the development of VN antibodies (e.g. Yuasa et al.,
          chickens infected by parenteral injection or by the oral route. The   1983b; Imai et al., 1999; Drén et al., 2000) and can remain present
          route of exposure and the dose of virus are important determi-  as latent virus for much longer (Cardona et al., 2000b). Interfer-
          nants for the outcome of infection. In general, oral inoculation   ence with antibody development by infectious bursal disease virus
          reduced or delayed viral replication and severity of the lesions   can prolong the persistence of CAV and increase the morbidity
          such as the decrease in weight gain and haematocrit values   and mortality even when birds are infected with CAV at an older
          compared with exposure by injection (Rosenberger and Cloud,   age (Yuasa et al., 1980b; von Bülow et al., 1986b; Rosenberger
          1989a; van Santen et al., 2004a; Tan and Tannock, 2005).  and Cloud, 1989a;  Imai et al.,  1999). Simultaneous  infections
            The  first  pathogenesis  studies  were  conducted  using  virus   with reovirus (McNeilly et al., 1995), MDV or REV (von Bülow
          isolation and/or staining of tissues for viral antigens (Yuasa et al.,   et al., 1986b) also aggravates the severity of CAV infections.
          1983b; Smyth et al., 1993). After the development of qPCR more
          specific information on virus titres was obtained (van Santen et   Pathogenesis in older chickens
          al., 2004a; Tan and Tannock, 2005; Kaffashi et al., 2006; Wani   Exposure to CAV after 2 weeks of age results in most instances in a
          et al., 2016) but the use of qPCR did not fundamentally change   subclinical infection except when the humoral immune response
          the data. Yuasa et al. (1983b) infected 1-day-old SPF chickens by   is compromised. Smyth et al. (2006) infected 3- and 6-week-old
          intramuscular injection and used virus isolation between 1 and   SPF chickens by the oral route. In 3-week-old birds, CAV antigen
          49 days pi. Spleen, liver and bone marrow had the highest titre   was detected in the thymus starting at 8 days pi and was abun-
          at 1 day pi. Thymus and kidney samples were positive on day 2   dant in the outer cortex of all birds between 13 and 17 days pi.
   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281