Page 484 - Clinical Small Animal Internal Medicine
P. 484

452  Section 5  Critical Care Medicine

            considered at the time of surgery, if applicable; their use in   atrophy and prevention of gut‐derived inflammatory
  VetBooks.ir  contaminated wounds (bite wounds) should be avoided,   complications. There are many ways of providing EN,
                                                              including voluntary ingestion, force feeding or syringe
            however. Epidural administration or placement of an epi-
            dural catheter can provide excellent pain management
                                                              tube feeding or surgically placed feeding tube (esophago-
            for animals with pelvic limb or pelvic ring trauma. If sacral   feeding, nasogastric, nasoesophageal or nasojejunal
            fracture or sacroiliac luxation is present or the landmarks   stomy tube, percutaneous gastrostomy tube, surgically
            used for epidural administration are disrupted then   placed gastrostomy tube, jejunostomy tube or gastrojeju-
            epidural administration should not be performed. Local   nostomy tube). The best way to provide EN will likely
            anesthetic drugs can also be  used systemically, with IV   vary on an individual case basis and consideration should
            infusion of lidocaine being useful as both an analgesic   be given to several factors when deciding the best
            adjunct and a promotility agent for management of ileus.  method for each patient.
             Both blunt trauma and burn injury are capable of   Nasoesophageal or nasogastric feeding tubes are useful
            inducing a very pronounced inflammatory state. The use   for animals that are not stable enough for an anesthetic
            of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can   event or for those that need a temporary bridge to
            be very beneficial in these patients. However, animals   voluntary eating or placement of a longer term feeding
            that are severely traumatized or are in shock should not   tube option. Nasogastric tubes can be useful for gastric
            be administered NSAIDs until all tissue perfusion has   decompression in animals with severe ileus and delayed
            normalized and is not anticipated to change abruptly.   gastric emptying.  One major  limitation  to the use  of
            Patients with severe soft tissue injury or crush injury are   nasoenteral feeding tubes is the limited number of diets
            at risk for development of myoglobinuria and renal   that can be administered through the small diameter of
            failure. Any animal that has pigmenturia or evidence of   the tube. Although generally well tolerated in the hospital
            renal insufficiency should not receive NSAIDs. The deci-  setting, these tubes are not particularly useful to send
            sion to use NSAID medications should be deliberate and   home with patients. Nasoenteral feeding tubes can be
            if case selection is appropriate then NSAIDs may prove   used in most veterinary patients but some small dogs
            to be a very useful analgesic adjunct. Due to the risk of   and cats may not be able to accommodate the tubes
            systemic side‐effects, including further impairment of   comfortably within the nasal cavity.
            the already compromised immune system in these      Animals that require a definitive surgical treatment
            patients,  animals  that  have  suffered  severe  trauma  or   may benefit from placement of a longer term feeding
            burn injury should not receive corticosteroid medica-  tube option at the time of surgery. Esophagostomy tubes
            tions unless specifically indicated.              or PEG tubes can be placed quickly in patients under
             Many animals that suffer severe soft tissue injury   general anesthesia. Esophagostomy tubes can be used for
            require repeated sedation events on concurrent days or   provision of nutritional support immediately following
            even multiple sedation events within the same 24‐hour   placement but are often limited in the types of food that
            period. Patients that are going to require repeated seda-  they can accommodate. Tube clogging is a common
            tion should be identified early in the course of hospi-  problem and may necessitate altering the food formula
            talization and measures should be taken to coordinate   to a more watery consistency. Percutaneously placed
            their care. Following repeated sedation with the same   gastrostomy tubes cannot be used for nutritional sup-
            anesthetic  medications  it  is  common  to  see  recovery   port for the first 24 hours to prevent leakage of gastric
            times become more prolonged and patients require   contents until a fibrous adhesion forms at the stoma.
            larger doses of drugs to achieve the same level of seda-  Surgically placed gastrostomy or gastrojejunostomy
            tion due to the development of tolerance. It is good   tubes can be utilized immediately.
            practice to alter the sedation protocol every few days to   The optimal timing of implementing nutritional sup-
            prevent development of tolerance or toxicity with   port is not known but evidence suggests that earlier is
            repeated dosing such as reported with propofol admin-  better. The clinician should strive to provide nutritional
            istration in cats. Additionally, animals that are sedated   support within the first 24–48 hours following severe
            serially are at risk for nutritional deficiency due to   trauma or burns. Patients that are hemodynamically
            repeated fasting. Efforts should be made to sedate the   compromised should not have nutritional support begun
            animal at the same time every day to allow for the most   until they are fully resuscitated and stable.
            opportunities to provide nutrition.                 When starting nutritional support, it is important to
                                                              have a plan in place for meeting nutritional require-
            Nutrition                                         ments. There is no evidence that provision of calories in
            The benefits of enteral nutrition (EN) for critically ill   excess of basal energy requirement (BER) is beneficial; in
            patients are well documented and include stimulating   fact, it may be detrimental. Many formulas are available
            production of  local antibody,  prevention of villous   for calculating caloric requirements but the basal energy
   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489