Page 474 - Small Animal Clinical Nutrition 5th Edition
P. 474

488        Small Animal Clinical Nutrition



                  Observed physiologic alterations in study cats were associated  recognized for more than 40 years and are now primarily asso-
        VetBooks.ir  with obesity-induced oxidative damage. Calories can easily  ciated with substandard catheter care. Most catheter-related
                                                                      septicemias are due to microbial invasion at the catheter wound
                  and safely be administered peripherally to dogs and cats using
                  a TNA of 400 to 650 mOsm/l or an isomolar 20% lipid solu-
                                                                      either during or after insertion, but other risk factors include
                  tion piggybacked with standard fluid therapy at volumes suf-  poor patient and personnel hygiene, operator inexperience,
                  ficient to meet RER. i                              method and site of catheter insertion, duration of catheteriza-
                                                                      tion and number of catheter manipulations (Bozzetti, 1985;
                  Other Routes of PN Infusion                         Yilmaz et al, 2007).
                  Intravascular complications associated with repeated catheter  Catheters for PN administration must be placed using
                  placements, insufficient blood flow or coagulation abnormal-  meticulous aseptic technique. Bandage contamination increas-
                  ities can limit vascular accessibility. Alternatives for PN sup-  es the risk of infection; peripheral vein catheters are more like-
                  port include the intraosseous and intraperitoneal (IP) routes,  ly to be exposed to and soiled by feces, urine and vomitus com-
                  as reported in several laboratory species, people (adults and  pared to CVCs (Hansen,2006).For either peripherally- or cen-
                  children) and dogs. In two separate studies, rats were infused  trally-placed catheters, bandage and administration sets should
                  with PN solutions through IP catheters for seven or more  be changed at least every other day, and preferably daily. When
                  days. No adverse effects from the placement or use of IP  the bandage is changed,the venipuncture site should be cleaned
                  catheters were found. Weight maintenance was dependent  with an iodine solution and examined for redness, edema or
                  on the caloric profile of the admixture; a PN solution approx-  swelling. A topical antibiotic ointment (e.g., povidone iodine)
                  imating 600 to 700 mOsm/l was preferred (Rubin et al,  that contains antifungal properties should be applied to the
                  1988; LeLeiko et al, 1983). PN solutions (850 mOsm/l) have  catheter-skin junction. If redness, edema or swelling is noticed,
                  been infused by IP routes for more than 20 days in 19 nor-  the catheter should be removed and cultured and the site
                  mal dogs and in 12 normal dogs that had undergone intes-  should be kept clean and hot packed, if necessary, to reduce
                  tinal resection (Moran et al, 1989; Garcia-Gamito et al,  swelling. Appropriate antibiotics should be given if culture and
                  1991). IP infusion of a 10% lipid solution into three-month-  antimicrobial sensitivity testing show the catheter or PN solu-
                  old beagles demonstrated that fat was quantitatively  tion is contaminated.
                  absorbed from the peritoneal cavity over a four-hour period  Cut-down incisions may be necessary for catheter placement
                  (Klein et al, 1983). Despite this apparent success, the IP  at any location and can increase the risk of infection. Infected
                  route for PN support isn’t widely used in veterinary medi-  or wounded skin at the catheter placement site increases the
                  cine. Intraosseous infusion of drugs and fluids is used as an  risk of infection (Hansen, 2006). If there is no other option for
                  emergency, last resort access site for human and veterinary  a catheter insertion site other than in close proximity to
                  patients. Reports of short-term PN infusion (e.g., bolus) are  wounded or infected skin, aseptic placement is absolutely nec-
                  limited, but encouraging. Tibial intraosseous infusion is the  essary. Extreme care should be exercised when assembling and
                  preferred site for critically ill children (Koenig, 2000), where-  disassembling the admixture flow system and frequent bandage
                  as the sternum is reported to be the most effective site for  changes are highly recommended. Tunneling or the “indirect
                  infusion of lipids in adults (Koenig, 2000). Likewise, a solu-  catheterization” method forms a subcutaneous tunnel between
                  tion containing electrolytes, amino acids, dextrose and vita-  the point of entry through the skin and the point of entry into
                  mins has been successfully infused intraosseously in dogs  the vein. Catheter tunneling helps prevent infection.This tech-
                  (Otto et al, 1989). Several precautions exist for intraosseous  nique is more commonly performed when placing a CVC for
                  infusions including appropriate catheter placement, avoiding  long-term use. Tunnels serve as a barrier to bacterial migration
                  compromised skin areas and growth plates and extravasation  (Hansen, 2006; Franga, 2002).
                  of fluid around bone cortices or vessel foramina (Moss et al,  In human intensive care units, catheter-related infections are
                  2005). Although fat embolization is a reasonable considera-  the third most common cause of nosocomial infections (CDC,
                  tion, it has yet to be reported in the literature.  1997). Although these data are not reported for veterinary
                                                                      patients, the findings most likely would be similar. Catheter
                  Risks and Complications                             infections are either related to cellulitis from contamination at
                  Catheter placement and management come with potential  the catheter exit site (type I) or microorganism contamination
                  risks. The most clinically significant problem in administering  within the catheter lumen (type II). Both are due to a failure in
                  PN solutions involves the catheter, including loss of access,  aseptic technique (Kaminski, 1997). Adding extra lumina to the
                  thrombophlebitis and infection generally in that order of occur-  same catheter appears to potentiate the risk for type II infections
                  rence. Parenteral feeding can introduce additional risks not  (Kaminski,1997; Early,1990; Kemp,1994).Data are controver-
                  associated with non-caloric fluid delivery. An overview of the  sial regarding the practice of maintaining a dedicated catheter
                  risks and complications associated with central and peripheral  line for PN administration. In the event a line cannot be dedi-
                  vein PN delivery follows.                           cated to PN administration, stopping PN delivery, flushing the
                                                                      line adequately before and after delivery of medications, then
                  Infection                                           restarting the PN delivery, will help minimize complications
                  Infectious complications with intravenous infusions have been  associated with potential solution incompatibilities.
   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479