Page 502 - Small Animal Clinical Nutrition 5th Edition
P. 502

518        Small Animal Clinical Nutrition


  VetBooks.ir       Table 27-6. Key nutritional factors for metabolic-control cat  carbohydrates should not exceed 20% (DM); lower is probably
                                                                        For metabolic weight-loss foods for cats, dietary digestible
                    foods for weight loss.
                                                                      better. When foods containing this level of dietary carbohy-
                    Factors    Dietary recommendations (dry matter basis)  drate in combination with increased protein and moderate fat
                    Carbohydrate  ≤20%                                are fed in appropriate amounts, they result in controlled weight
                    Protein    At least 47% but not exceed 55%                                                a
                    Fat        ≤25%                                   loss in cats (Butterwick and Markwell, 1994, 1996).
                    Fiber      ≥5%
                    L-carnitine  ≥500 ppm                             Protein
                    Antioxidants  Foods for weight loss and prevention of weight
                               regain should contain:                 Cats have an innate metabolic capacity to readily use protein
                      Vitamin E  ≥500 IU vitamin E/kg                 (amino acids) for energy (Chapter 19). The natural diet of cats
                      Vitamin C  100 to 200 mg vitamin C/kg           is primarily animal tissue and contains only small amounts of
                      Selenium  0.5 to 1.3 mg selenium/kg
                    Sodium     Foods for weight loss should contain between  digestible carbohydrate. Cats, therefore, typically have lower
                               0.2 to 0.6%                            levels of hepatic glucokinase than do omnivorous species and
                    Phosphorus  Foods for weight loss should contain between  have higher levels of transaminases and deaminases that do not
                               0.5 to 0.8%
                                                                      down regulate, even when protein intake is reduced. Thus, cats
                                                                      have a higher protein requirement and are metabolically geared
                                                                      to use protein for energy. Cats rely heavily on glucogenic amino
                  restricted foods, simple sugars and complex carbohydrates (i.e.,  acids to generate glucose for glucose-dependent tissues
                  grain sources) have received much attention in human weight-  (Macdonald et al, 1984) (Chapter 19).
                  loss programs because of the known effects of various carbohy-  Increasing its protein content can reduce the carbohydrate
                  drates on the glycemic index. As in people, consumption of dif-  content of a food. As discussed for the key nutritional factors
                  ferent sugars and carbohydrate sources alters postprandial glu-  for the energy-restriction approach to weight loss, relying on
                  cose levels and insulin secretory patterns in cats and dogs  dietary protein as a major energy source has beneficial meta-
                  (Flickinger and Sunvold, 2005; Bouchard and Sunvold, 2000;  bolic effects for weight loss. These effects include reduced
                  Nguyen et al, 1998; Sunvold and Bouchard, 1998). Therefore,  energy efficiency, satiety effects and preservation of lean body
                  foods producing low glycemic responses should be recom-  mass.
                  mended for obese or diabetic patients.                In people, increasing a food’s protein content increases its
                    The stimulatory effect of increased carbohydrate intake on  thermic and satiety effects (Crovetti et al, 1998). The TEF is
                  insulin secretion provides for a metabolic shift to support fat  the obligatory cost of digesting and absorbing food. TEF con-
                  deposition, given the potent lipogenic effects of insulin. In con-  stitutes approximately 10% of total expenditure. Thus, increas-
                  trast, low-carbohydrate foods, particularly in combination with  ing a food’s thermic effect reduces its energy efficiency
                  fat, protein and fiber, result in a more blunted insulin response  (Danforth, 1985; Horton, 1983). In a human study, 10 people
                  that helps set the stage for fat use. Also, as discussed above, by  received, in randomized order, high-protein, high-fat and high-
                  using less available carbohydrate sources, the glycemic index  carbohydrate meals.The high-protein meal was the most ther-
                  can be modified to further shift energy use to be more depend-  mogenic (p <0.001) and it determined the highest sensation of
                  ent on amino acids (protein), fat and ketones. Furthermore, in  fullness (p = 0.002). There were no differences in the sensation
                  the calorie-restriction approach to weight loss, different sugar  and thermic effects between the high-fat and high-carbohy-
                  and starch sources variably affect postprandial glucose levels  drate meals. A significant relationship linked TEF to fullness
                  and insulin secretory patterns in cats (Bouchard and Sunvold,  sensation (r = 0.41, p = 0.025) (Crovetti et al, 1998).
                  2000). Carbohydrate sources that result in a lower glycemic  Increasing the dietary protein level during weight loss
                  index are more desirable for metabolic weight control.  spares lean body mass. In one study in cats, 47% DM dietary
                  Compared to barley, corn and sorghum, rice as a starch source  crude protein preserved lean body mass during controlled
                  produces the highest glycemic index in cats. Therefore, as with  weight loss (1% per week). In this study, weight loss did not
                  energy-restricted foods, it is probably best if rice is not one of  differ significantly between cats fed a high-protein food and
                  the first three or four non-water ingredients on the product’s  those fed a control food with less protein. However, the high-
                  label (Chapter 9).                                  protein group had significantly greater loss of body fat and
                    A reduced ratio of dietary carbohydrate to protein in people  significantly less loss of lean body mass (Laflamme and
                  has a satiety effect (Layman et al, 2003). Lowering the glycemic  Hannah, 2005).
                  index could have an effect on satiety because a rapid increase in  Theoretically, prolonged, excessive protein intake poses
                  blood glucose typically evokes an equally intense insulin  some risks. Consumption of high-protein diets in people (i.e.,
                  response that can lead to a period of hypoglycemia followed by  two to three times the U.S. Recommended Daily Allowance)
                  hunger. In people, this occurs approximately two hours after a  increases urinary calcium loss and may, over time, predispose
                  meal (Roberts, 2000). However, increasing protein can also  to bone loss (Eisenstein et al, 2002). However, cats have a rel-
                  have a satiety effect (see below). The satiety effect of a reduced  atively high protein requirement because of their obligatory
                  dietary carbohydrate to protein ratio may be due to both com-  use of amino acids in gluconeogenesis (Chapter 19) and are
                  ponents.                                            well adapted to using dietary protein. The protein require-
   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507