Page 631 - Small Animal Clinical Nutrition 5th Edition
P. 631

Skin and Hair Disorders      653


                  in the dermis, and assess the ability of IgE to fix allergen and
                                                                       Table 32-6. Key nutritional factors for foods and supplements for
                  cause mast cell degranulation and subsequent vasodilatation. In
        VetBooks.ir  a well-controlled study using allergen mixes, 59% of dogs  dogs and cats with inflammatory dermatoses.
                                                                       Factors
                                                                                             Nutritional recommendations
                  responded to hyposensitization that was formulated on the
                  basis of intradermal testing results (Willemse et al, 1984).  Omega-3 fatty acids (ALA,   Supplements or foods should
                                                                       EPA and/or DHA)       initially provide 50 to 300 mg total
                    Intradermal allergy testing has several disadvantages (Hillier           omega-3 fatty acids/kg body
                  and DeBoer, 2001). Negative intradermal results occur in some              weight/day
                                                                                             Foods should contain between
                  dogs strongly suspected to have atopic dermatitis. Anti-
                                                                                             0.35 to 1.8% dry matter
                  inflammatory and antihistamine drugs must be withdrawn
                  before testing to prevent false-negative results. The test cannot  Key: ALA = α-linolenic acid, EPA = eicosapentaenoic acid, DHA
                                                                       = docosahexaenoic acid.
                  be performed on dogs with generalized dermatitis. Shaving of
                  the coat and sedation are usually required. Intradermal allergy
                  testing is time-consuming and not cost-effective when per-
                  formed infrequently.The usefulness of intradermal allergy test-
                  ing is also limited by lack of standardized allergy extracts and
                  no homogeneous criteria for the interpretation of results. Most
                  intradermal testing is performed at dermatologic referral cen-
                  ters because of these disadvantages. Intradermal testing for
                  food hypersensitivity is unreliable in animals with dermatolog-
                  ic disease (Chapter 31).
                    In vitro “allergy” tests measure serum concentrations of aller-
                  gen-specific IgE and avoid many of the disadvantages of intra-
                  dermal allergy tests (Codner and Griffin, 1996). In vitro tests
                  require only a serum sample; so they are readily available to pri-
                  vate practitioners and can be used on patients with generalized
                  dermatitis. Laboratories use several different techniques to
                  detect circulating IgE levels, including a radioallergosorbent
                  test (RAST), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or
                  liquid-phase enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Problems with in
                  vitro testing include poor reproducibility and a high false-pos-
                  itive rate (Codner and Lessard, 1993). Results to date suggest
                  that more than 60% of atopic dogs respond to hyposensitiza-
                  tion formulated on the basis of in vitro results (Anderson, 1993;
                  Sousa and Norton, 1990). In vitro testing is also available for
                  confirming  flea-allergic dermatitis (Cook et al, 1996) but is
                  unreliable for diagnosing food hypersensitivity (Chapter 31).
                    Controversy continues over whether intradermal or in vitro
                  testing is the better method for confirming a diagnosis of atopic
                  dermatitis and for selecting allergens for hyposensitization
                  (DeBoer and Hillier, 2001). Furthermore, long-term studies are
                  needed to evaluate responses of allergic animals to hyposensiti-
                  zation based on both types of testing.

                  Risk Factors
                  Atopy (atopic state) is a genetically-predisposed tendency to
                  develop IgE-mediated allergy to environmental allergens (Oli-
                  vry et al, 2001c). Atopic disease is any clinical manifestation of
                  atopy including most commonly atopic dermatitis, atopic con-
                  junctivitis and/or atopic rhinitis (Olivry et al, 2001c). Atopic
                  dermatitis is a genetically predisposed inflammatory and pru-
                  ritic allergic skin disease with characteristic clinical features  Figure 32-3. Metabolic transformation of two major unsaturated
                                                                      fatty acid families by desaturation and elongation.
                  (Olivry et al, 2001c). It is associated most commonly with IgE
                  antibodies to environmental allergens. Although the exact
                  mode of inheritance is unknown, strong breed predilection and  clude Cairn terriers,West Highland white terriers, Scottish ter-
                  familial involvement in dogs indicate a genetically determined  riers, wire-haired fox terriers, Boston terriers, Sealyham terriers,
                  cause. Canine breeds reported to be predisposed to atopy in-  Lhasa apsos, Dalmatians, pugs, Irish setters, English setters,
   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636