Page 47 - CHIRP Annual Digest 2017
P. 47

CHIRP Annual Digest 2017



            CHIRP Comment                                        • There was no obvious rescue means on hand at the top
            CHIRP and the UK’s Marine Accident Investigation Branch   of the work area.
            (MAIB) have several cases of dragging anchors, the latest     • The inertia-wire rope unit was not directly above
            for CHIRP was published in Maritime FEEDBACK 45. MAIB   the  worker. Should  they have  fallen  they  would  have
            report 28-2012 details an incident where windlass damage   suffered  the  pendulum  effect.  The  wire  was  passing
            was the precursor to a series of incidents.         over a sharp coaming.
                                                                 • The inertia unit was secured to handrails that were in
            Mariners do not always appreciate the limitations of an   poor condition.
            anchor, even when they take into consideration the depth
            of water and amount of cable to be used. If winds of Force   There are many factors here, including the design of a
            6 are expected, the generic advice is for ships to heave   gangway area that seems to have no regard for how to rig
            anchor and go to safe waters or out to sea. Wind, wave   safely. The idea that someone is expected to walk down a
            and current limitations for an anchor system are given in   gangway with no rails and then lift those rails into place
            the DNV-GL article highlighted below. Procedures and train-  shows that good human-centred design has a long way to
            ing  should  cover  an  understanding  of  the  environmental   go in our industry.
            and operational limitations of the anchoring equipment.
            Proper maintenance following manufacturer’s recommen-  Further to this, if we can’t change the design we should at
            dations is essential. It is important to note that the wind   least consider how we make people safe carrying out this
            speed limit should be greatly reduced as the wave height   task? How do we get an unconscious person back to deck
            increases, because the anchor design assumes that   level when using a safety harness and stop them dying from
            anchoring takes place in sheltered waters. In addition, the   suspension trauma?
            effect of windage is much greater on a ballasted vessel,
            particularly larger vessels.                      Typical marine industry reaction will likely be more training
                                                              for the seafarer to ensure he/she is blamed for what is, at
            DNV-GL, The Swedish Club and GARD have published some   root, a design issue not a behaviour/training issue.
            excellent advice which may be found by on the DNV-GL web-
            site as ‘Most anchor losses are avoidable’. References
            within this article include an anchor loss video, ‘Anchor loss
            prevention’ which is well worth watching.

            In addition, the Board highlighted the fact that there have
            been several cases of anchor windlass motor explosions,
            some causing serious injury. An article from the Maritime
            Accident Casebook further discusses these. Maritime Acci-
            dent Casebook – exploding windlass refers.

            The DNV-GL anchor loss article states that 34% of anchor
            losses are due to weather, 24% due to the winch or motor
            failures, and 21% due to operational procedures. The above
            links are well worth reviewing to ensure that you do not
            become another anchoring statistic.

            All of the references mentioned above can be accessed
            from the publications page of the CHIRP MARITIME website
            https://chirpmaritime.org/publications
                                                              Lifejacket with safety lanyard.
                         The above article was published in MFB47
                                                              CHIRP Comment
            Article. 37                                       The Maritime Advisory Board agreed with all aspects of this
                                                              report. It is good example of Human Centred Design not
            An illusion of safety                             being applied, forcing crews to work around the problem.
                                                              Designers take note!
            OUTLINE: A report outlining dangers with inertia-wire rope
            safety lanyards when not used correctly.                        The above article was published in MFB49

            What the Reporter told us:
            Rigging  the  gangway, the  crew  were  dutifully  using  iner-
            tia-wire rope safety lanyards clipped to the webbing straps of
            life jackets. There were a few issues of concern and I don’t
            believe they are unique to this vessel.
               • The lifejacket was not of a type designed for fall arrest.
              (Lanyard clipped around strap and strap around torso).
               • There was no energy absorbing lanyard in use.



                                                           46
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52