Page 10 - CHIRP annual digest 2016.pdf
P. 10

CHIRP Maritime



























                                                                            Back Springs




                                                 Breast Ropes                                       Crew
                                                 Crew

                                                                             Ofcer
                                              Crew














             poor leads. This led to excessive strain being placed on the  This  is  a  good  example  of  an  inappropriate  berth  in
             lines as the departing passenger vessel’s wake interacted  relation to the size of vessel; it could have been refused.
             with the moored vessel.                           Ships’  mooring  arrangements  are  designed  for  con -
                                                               ventional long leads forward and aft. The use of stern
             The design of the ship’s after mooring station appears poor;
                                                               (and probably head) lines in reverse direction as shown
             mooring lines may be at greater risk of parting due to the  greatly increases the stress on mooring arrangements,
             angled leads and the need to use roller leads across the deck.
                                                               and encourages premature failure with obvious safety
             In this case the mooring bollards have not been employed.  implications. In this case the passenger ship’s manoeuvres
             There is an apparent lack of general awareness; the officer
                                                               at very close quarters may – through interaction and
             and crew members had placed themselves within the after  surge – have amplified the danger of mooring failure.
             mooring ropes snap back zone at a time when the mooring
             lines were likely to come under surge load.
                                                               CHIRP Suggests
             The lessons to be learnt                          The whole mooring deck in this case is a “snap back
             A charterer’s responsibility is to provide a safe berth for  zone” especially in such a confined area with multiple
             a ship. The Master’s right and responsibility is to refuse  unconventional leads. Consideration may be given to
             the berth where – based on observation, professional  identifying  and  marking  alternative  “tension  spots”.
             judgment, and the prevalent conditions – he considers  These  carefully  considered  relatively  safe  points  for
             the  standard  not  to  have  been  met.  Commercial  mooring parties to stand and operate will limit exposure
             pressures can of course make this a challenging call;  to snap back and discipline crew to remain in sheltered
             there are suggestions that inappropriate berthing is on  areas to the maximum extent possible. Mooring lines may
             the increase under the weight of increasing maritime  be  subject  to  surge  at  any  time;  roaming  and  un -
             trade and ship sizes.                             authorised  movement  on  working  decks  should  be


                                                            9
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15