Page 64 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 64

development.  (Kretzmann  &  McKnight,  1993)  The  Community  Development  Program  at

               Northwestern University’s Institute for Policy Research established the Asset-Based Community


               Development (ABCD) Institute and it is based on three decades of research and community work

               by John P. Kretzmann and John L. McKnight.    The ABCD Institute focuses its efforts in two


               areas:  (1) through  extensive and substantial  interactions  with  community  builders,  and (2) by

               producing practical resources and tools for community builders to identify, nurture, and mobilize


               neighborhood assets and anchor institutions.


                       Since ABCD relies on existing community assets to create change, it has been criticized


               for implying that disadvantaged communities have all the resources they need to solve community

               problems. (Ennis & West, 2010) According to the ABCD Institute, however, ABCD methodology

               recognizes that systemic injustice may require disadvantaged communities to seek assistance from


               outside the community. ABCD maintains that interventions from exterior sources will be most


               effective when a community’s assets are leveraged at full capacity. (Kretzmann & McKnight,

               1993, p. 14) ABCD is described as a more sustainable model of community development than

               needs-based  community  development,  because  needs-based  approaches  may  perpetuate


               community  problems  by  emphasizing  deficiencies  and  the  necessity  for  reliance  on  outside

               assistance. By contrast, ABCD aims to build capacity within communities by expanding their


               social capital. (Kretzmann & McKnight, 1993, p. 14) By working with outside resources and

               simultaneously building trust within the community, more members can make use of a wider array


               of strengths and create opportunity where it may not have been as accessible before.


                       To create the opportunity, to have voice, and thereby to exchange views in a public setting


               is one thing, however, the manner in which participants engage with each other is crucial to the

               success of such meetings.


                                                             45
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69