Page 34 - כתב עת מתמטי - גיליון 6
P. 34
Lamov, D. (2010). Teach like a champion: 49 techniques that will ronments for thinking and problem solving. European
put students on the path to college. Sun Francisco: Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(4), 365-384.
Jossey-Bass. doi: 10.1007/BF03173216
Leikin, R. (2006). Learning by teaching: The case of Sieve of Era- Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering
tosthenes and one elementary school teacher. In R. Zaz- self-regulatrd learning among students: A meta-analy-
kis & S. R. Campbaal (Eds.), Number theory in mathe- sis on intervention studies at primary and secondary
matics education: Perspectives and prospects (pp. school level. Metacognition Learning, 3(3), 231-264.
115-140). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. doi: 10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x
Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2012). Understanding and Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2010). Assessing how teachers enhance
developing science teachers’ pedagogical content self-regulated learning (ATES) – Development of an
knowledge (2nd ed.). Rotterdam: Sense. observation instrument for the primary and secondary
school classroom. Manuscript submitted for publica-
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: tion.
Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics
in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Dignath, C., Büttner, G., & Langfeldt, H. P. (2008). How can pri-
mary school students learn self-regulated learning strat-
Masui, C., & De Corte, E. (2005). Learning to reflect and to attri- egies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regula-
bute constructively as basic components of self-regulat- tion training programmes .Educational Research
ed learning. British journal of educational psychology, Review, 3(2), 101-129. doi: 10.1016/j.
75(3), 351-372. doi: 10.1348/000709905X25030 edurev.2008.02.003
Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. (2003). The effects of metaco- Greene, J. A., & Azevado, R. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne
nitive training versus worked-out examples on stu- and Hadwin’s model of self-regulated learning: New
dents’ mathematical reasoning. British Journal of perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Re-
Educational Psychology, 73(4), 449-471. search, 77(3), 334-372. doi: 10.3102/003465430303953
Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. (2014). Critical maths for inno- Grossman, P. L. (1992). Why models matter: An alternate view on
vative societies: The role of metacognitive pedagogies. professional growth in teaching. Review Educational
Paris: OECD. Research, 62(2), 171-179.
Michalsky, T. (2012). Shaping self-regulation in science teachers’ Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800
professional growth: Inquiry skills. Science Education, meta-analyses relating to achievement. London & New
96(6), 1106-1113. York: Routledge.
Michalsky, T., & Schechter, C., (2013). Preservice teachers’ capac- Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’
ity to teach self-regulated learning: Integrating learning mathematical knowledge for teaching on student
from problems and learning from successes. Teaching achievement. American Educational Research Jour-
and Teacher Education, 30(1), 60-73. doi: 10.1016/j. nal, 42(2), 371-406.
tate.2012.10.009
Isoda, M., Stephens, M., Ohara, Y., & Miyakawa, T. (2007). Japa-
Moreno, R. (2006). When worked examples don’t work: Is cogni- nese lesson study in mathematics: Its impact, diversity
tive load theory at an impasse? Learning and Instruc- and potential for educational improvement. Singapore:
tion, 16(2), 170-181. doi: 10.1016/j.learnin- World Scientific Publishing.
struc.2006.02.006
Kennedy, M. M. (2006). Knowledge and vision in teaching. Jour-
Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of re- nal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 205-211. doi:
search on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychol- 10.1177/0022487105285639
ogist, 36(2), 89-101.
Kersting, N. B., Givvin, K. B., Sotelo, F. L., & Stigler J. W. (2010).
Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of Teachers’ analyses of classroom video predict stu-
pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a con- dent learning of mathematics: Further explorations
ceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. of a novel measure of teacher knowledge. Journal of
Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284. doi: teacher education, 61(1-2), 172-181.
10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal
Park, S., Jang, J. Y., Chen, Y. C., & Jung, J. (2011). Is pedagogical guidance during instruction does not work: An anal-
knowledge (PCK) necessary for reformed science ysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, prob-
teaching? Evidence from an empirical study. Red Sci- lem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teach-
ence Education Journal, 41(2), 245-260. doi: 10.1007/ ing. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
s11165-009-9163-8
Kistner, S., Rakoczy, K., Otto, B., Dignath-van Ewijk, C., Büttner,
Pierce, J. W., & Kalkman, D. L. (2003). Applying learner-centered G., & Klieme, E. (2010). Promoting of self-regulated
principles in teacher education. Theory into Practice, learning in classrooms: Investigating, frequency, quali-
42(2), 127-132. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4202_6 ty, and consequences for student performance. Meta-
cognition and Learning, 5(2), 157-171.
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing moti-
vation and self-regulated learning in college students. Koichu, B., Berman, A., & Moore, M. (2007). Heuristic literacy
Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-407. doi: development and its relation to mathematical
10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x achievements of middle school students. Instruction-
al Science, 35(2), 99-139. doi: 10.1007/s11251-006-
Randi, J. (2004). Teachers as self-regulated-learners. Teachers Col- 9004-3
lege Record, 106(9), 1825-1853. doi:
10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00407.x – מחקר ועיון בחינוך מתמטי6 │גיליון32
